2012年-IMF国际货币组织全球_Spain_Basel_Core_Principles_for_Effective_Banking_Supervision__Detailed_Assessment_of_Compliance_Report_122页_999kb
报告摘要
Summary of Spain's Compliance with the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision
Core Content
This document is a detailed assessment of Spain's compliance with the Basel Core Principles (BCP) for Effective Banking Supervision, conducted as part of an updated Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) by the IMF in May 2012. The assessment is based on the legal framework, supervisory practices, and the current state of the financial sector in Spain. It does not aim to evaluate the EU regulatory framework or the restructuring of the savings banks (Cajas) sector, which is covered in the broader FSAP exercise.
Main Findings and Key Issues
1. Economic and Sectoral Context
- Spain experienced a significant real estate bubble burst after a decade of excess, leading to a sharp decline in land values and financial conditions of developers.
- The crisis severely impacted savings banks due to their heavy lending to real estate and construction.
- The sector underwent a major restructuring, with most savings banks converted into commercial banks.
- Spanish banks have a high level of assets, with total assets amounting to about 320% of GDP, and five banks accounting for over 70% of the total assets.
- The banking system remains under pressure due to increased provisioning and capital requirements.
2. Supervisory Process and Authority
- The Banco de España (BdE) is the main supervisory authority and has a strong and experienced supervisory process.
- The BdE lacks the authority to issue prudential regulations independently and must rely on legal delegation from the Ministry of Economy (MoE).
- The BdE's enforcement tools are limited, and corrective actions are often delayed, affecting the timeliness of resolution efforts.
3. Legal and Regulatory Framework
- The legal framework for transparency and governance of publicly traded institutions has improved, especially since 2006.
- Spanish accounting standards are almost fully aligned with IFRS, with minor differences in capitalizing research expenses.
- The BdE, as a member of the Eurosystem, can provide Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) to solvent banks facing temporary liquidity issues, subject to ECB consultation for larger amounts.
4. Financial Safety Net and Crisis Management
- The Fondo de Garantía de Depósitos (FGD) and Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria (FROB) are key agencies in the financial safety net.
- The FGD is a private legal entity, prefunded by member institutions, with a broad range of intervention powers.
- The FROB was established in 2009 to assist in the reorganization of the banking sector, especially savings banks, and has been expanded in 2012.
- The resolution framework involves multiple authorities, with the BdE acting as the triggering authority and the FROB as the administrator in case of non-viability.
5. Compliance with Core Principles
- The assessment used a four-part grading system: compliant, largely compliant, materially noncompliant, and noncompliant.
- The BdE identified the need for provisions early but delayed formal decisions due to the complexity of the regulatory process.
- There are concerns regarding the timeliness and effectiveness of remedial actions, the operational independence of the BdE, and oversight of concentration risk and related party transactions.
Key Recommendations and Authorities' Response
- The BdE needs to enhance its authority to issue prudential regulations and enforce corrective actions more effectively.
- A more flexible and timely enforcement regime is recommended to allow for rapid response to evolving risks.
- The authorities have made progress in addressing past recommendations, including tightening capital requirements and improving corporate governance.
- The BdE has been working on a more integrated approach with the CCAAs and other agencies to ensure effective supervision.
Conclusion
The assessment highlights the strengths and weaknesses of Spain's banking supervision system, emphasizing the need for improvements in enforcement and timeliness. Despite the high technical quality of supervision, the process for bank resolution is not sufficiently effective, particularly in dealing with systemic risks. The report underscores the importance of a proportionate and context-sensitive approach to supervision, and the need for enhanced coordination and regulatory flexibility to address the evolving challenges in the financial sector.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载