2013年-世界发展银行全球_Cumulative_Impact_Assessment_and_Management___Guidance_for_the_Private_Sector_in_Emerging_Markets_102页_1mb

Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management: Guidance for the Private Sector in Emerging Markets

Core Content

This Good Practice Handbook (GPH) provides guidance to private sector companies operating in emerging markets on how to assess and manage cumulative impacts, which are the combined or incremental effects of a project or activity over time, especially when multiple developments occur in the same area or affect the same resource. The handbook is developed by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and ESSA Technologies Ltd., with contributions from a team of experts and peer reviewers.

Main Points

Definition and Importance of Cumulative Impacts

• Cumulative impacts are the result of successive, incremental, or combined effects of actions, projects, or activities (referred to as "developments") when added to other existing, planned, or reasonably anticipated future ones.
• These impacts are often overlooked in traditional environmental and social impact assessments (ESIAs), but they are critical for understanding and managing risks in complex environments.

What is Cumulative Impact Assessment and Management (CIA)?

• CIA is a framework for identifying, assessing, and managing the combined or incremental effects of multiple developments on valued environmental and social components (VECs).
• It is essential for risk management in the context of systemwide risk factors such as climate change, biodiversity loss, ecosystem degradation, and socio-economic changes.

When to Conduct a CIA

• A CIA should be conducted when a development may significantly affect the viability or sustainability of VECs or may be at risk from cumulative effects on the VECs it depends on.
• It is particularly important in areas where multiple projects are planned or where cumulative effects are likely to have major environmental or social consequences.

Expected Outcomes of CIA

• Identification of cumulative impacts on VECs.
• Assessment of the significance of these impacts.
• Design and implementation of mitigation measures to manage cumulative effects.
• Enhancement of environmental and social management systems (ESMS).

Comparison with Other Tools

• CIA differs from ESIA in that it focuses on the combined effects of multiple developments, while ESIA typically assesses the impact of a single project.
• CIA is a more comprehensive and iterative process that may involve multiple stakeholders, including governments, NGOs, and communities.

Key Recommendations

• Use a six-step RCIA (Rapid Cumulative Impact Assessment) process as a preliminary tool, especially in the absence of government-led CIA frameworks.
• Engage stakeholders early and throughout the decision-making process to ensure transparency and informed management.
• Document the rationale and technical basis for each decision made during the assessment.
• Consider the differentiated approach of impact vs. leverage, where private developers may have limited control over some VECs but can influence others through collaboration.

Challenges and Solutions

• Challenges include:
  • Lack of baseline data.
  • Uncertainty about future developments.
  • Limited government capacity.
  • Absence of strategic planning frameworks.
• Solutions include:
  • Clarifying roles and responsibilities among stakeholders.
  • Establishing constructive relationships with governments and other stakeholders.
  • Following internationally recognized good practices, such as those from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency or the U.S. Council on Environmental Quality.

Conclusion

• CIA is a critical tool for managing environmental and social risks in emerging markets.
• While government-led CIA is ideal, it is often absent, making it necessary for private developers to take proactive steps in identifying and mitigating cumulative impacts.
• The handbook emphasizes the importance of collaboration and multistakeholder engagement in the effective management of cumulative impacts.

Key Concepts

• VECs (Valued Environmental and Social Components): Resources or areas that are ecologically, socially, or culturally significant and may be affected by cumulative impacts.
• RCIA (Rapid Cumulative Impact Assessment): A simplified version of CIA used as a preliminary screening tool.
• ESIA (Environmental and Social Impact Assessment): A standard assessment process for individual projects.
• ESMS (Environmental and Social Management System): A framework for managing environmental and social impacts throughout a project’s lifecycle.

Box Highlights

• Box 1: Differentiated Approach – Impact vs. Leverage.

  • Private developers should differentiate between actions they control and those they can influence.
  • In some cases, developers can play a key role in shaping governance structures and management strategies.

• Box 2: Demise of the Aral Sea.

  • Illustrates the long-term environmental consequences of cumulative impacts from multiple projects and activities.

• Box 3: Valued Environmental and Social Components.

  • Highlights the importance of identifying and protecting VECs that are critical for environmental and social sustainability.

• Box 4: Hydro Cascade with no Governmental Requirement for CIA.

  • Shows how cumulative impacts can occur even without formal requirements.

• Box 5: Contrasting Views of the Need for Impact Management.

  • Emphasizes the need for a balanced and comprehensive approach to managing cumulative impacts.

• Box 6: CIA When Different Project Components are Subject to Separate ESAs.

  • Highlights the complexity of managing cumulative impacts when projects are subject to separate assessments.

• Box 7: Rules of Thumb – How to Set Geographical and Temporal Boundaries.

  • Provides guidance on defining the scope of a CIA.

• Box 8: Establishing the Spatial Boundary for CIA.

  • Explains how to define the spatial boundaries for assessing cumulative impacts.

• Box 9: Cumulative Impacts of Climate and Hydropower.

  • Illustrates how climate change and hydropower projects can interact to create cumulative impacts.

• Box 10: Strategic Approach to Assessing Multiple Small Developments (Scoping).

  • Outlines the scoping phase of CIA for multiple small projects.

• Box 11: Strategic Approach to Assessing Multiple Small Developments (Analysis).

  • Describes the analysis phase of CIA for multiple small projects.

• Box 12: RCIA of Hydro Impacts on American Eel.

  • Shows an example of how RCIA can be applied to assess specific cumulative impacts.

• Box 13: Shared Responsibility for Management of Cumulative Impacts.

  • Emphasizes the shared responsibility between developers and governments.

• Box 14: Mitigation of Panama Hydroelectric Developments.

  • Provides an example of successful mitigation strategies for cumulative impacts.

• Box 15: Regional Collaboration in CIA.

  • Highlights the importance of regional collaboration in managing cumulative impacts.

Appendices

• Appendix 1: Examples of indicators for assessing cumulative impacts.
• Appendix 2: Basic Logic Framework – Lessons from CIA practice.
• Appendix 3: Standard Annotated ToR for an RCIA.

References

• Includes citations from various sources, including the U.S. Council on Environmental Quality, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, and IFC's own Performance Standards and Guidance Notes.