2008年-世界发展银行全球_Update_of_the_Country_Procurement_Assessment_Review_94页_957kb

Summary of the Republic of Mozambique and the World Bank Joint Report (CPAR Update, June 2008)

Core Content

This report presents an updated assessment of the public procurement systems in Mozambique, conducted in 2008 by the Mozambique Government, the World Bank (The Bank), the African Development Bank (AfDB), and the donor community. The assessment is based on the OECD DAC Methodology and aims to evaluate the progress made since the previous CPAR in 2002, recommend a monitoring mechanism, and identify areas for improvement in the procurement system.

Main Viewpoints

• Public Procurement is a Critical Area: Public procurement is a central pillar of public expenditure management in Mozambique due to its high volume and relevance to both the private sector and governance.
• Significant Progress Since 2002: The country has made notable advancements in legal and regulatory frameworks, the establishment of a centralized procurement system, and the creation of the regulatory body, UFSA.
• Need for Continued Reform: Despite progress, challenges remain in implementation, transparency, integrity, and capacity building.
• Donor Support and Collaboration: The assessment involved close collaboration between the Government, the World Bank, AfDB, and KfW, highlighting the importance of donor engagement in supporting reforms.
• Strategic Alignment: Public procurement reform is aligned with broader PFM and public sector reform strategies, including the Poverty Reduction Support Credits (PRSCs) and the Country Partnership Strategy (CPS).

Key Information

Country Background

• Mozambique is a strong-performing African country with rapid economic growth and poverty reduction achievements.
• Public procurement constitutes about 15% of GDP and 55% of public expenditures, with a large share (75%) of capital expenditures coming from international donors.

Strategic Context

• Public procurement is an integral part of the Government's PFM reform strategy, including the implementation of the integrated financial management system (e-SISTAFE).
• The CPAR update is part of the broader public sector reform agenda and supports the implementation of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.

Methodology

• The OECD DAC Methodology is used to assess the procurement system, focusing on compliance and performance indicators.
• The assessment was participatory, involving Government officials, the private sector, civil society, and donors.
• A launch workshop was held on March 10, 2008, to introduce the methodology and gather data.

Progress Since 2002

• The legal and regulatory framework has been significantly improved, with the introduction of the 2005 Public Procurement Regulations and the establishment of the UFSA.
• Procurement is now more transparent, and open competition is the default process.
• The procurement system is increasingly integrated into the broader PFM system, with the creation of standard bidding documents and procedures.

Areas of Opportunity

Pillar 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework

• Bidder Access: Unjustified requirements for foreign firms, such as proof of non-bankruptcy status or local representation, hinder competition.
• Transparency and Integrity: The Regulamento does not clearly state that bids are opened immediately after submission, and the lack of an independent forum for appeals undermines the integrity of the system.
• Contract Management: Need for stronger regulations on procurement planning, contract slicing, and record management.

Pillar 2: Institutional Framework and Management

• Capacity Building: Training for procurement staff is still limited and needs to be expanded.
• Institutional Oversight: The UFSA and UGEA have been established, but their effectiveness and integration into the overall PFM system require further development.
• Decentralization: Procurement is now decentralized to the provincial and district levels, but this requires strengthening of local capacities.

Pillar 3: Procurement Operations and Market Practices

• Business Climate: The private sector benefits significantly from public procurement, but there are concerns about lack of transparency and favoritism.
• Competition and Participation: While open competition is now the norm, there is still room for improving the participation of the private sector and ensuring fair practices.

Pillar 4: Integrity and Transparency

• Complaint Mechanism: The current mechanism lacks independence and accessibility, and the requirement to pay a fee for lodging complaints is a barrier.
• Anti-Corruption: Procurement is identified as one of the most vulnerable areas to corruption. The Government has initiated an anti-corruption strategy, but it needs to be more effectively implemented.

Recommended Action Plan

• Strengthen the legal and regulatory framework by clarifying requirements for bidder access and ensuring transparency in the procurement process.
• Establish an independent and accessible complaints mechanism to allow for effective remedies without compromising efficiency.
• Enhance capacity building through professional training programs and better integration of procurement into the overall PFM system.
• Foster collaboration between the Government, civil society, the private sector, and donors to maintain momentum in reform.
• Improve the procurement process by ensuring compliance with international standards and promoting a competitive and transparent environment.

Conclusion

The CPAR update highlights the progress made by Mozambique in reforming its public procurement system, particularly in the legal and regulatory framework. However, it also identifies critical areas that require further improvement, such as transparency, integrity, and capacity building. The recommended action plan aims to support the Government in achieving internationally acceptable standards in public procurement and ensuring the effective implementation of reforms.