EBA欧洲银行-EBA_TR_AT_PQOH26KWDF7CG10L6792_29页_5mb
报告摘要
2016 EU-wide Stress Test Summary
Core Information
- Bank Name: Erste Group Bank AG
- LEI Code: PQOH26KWDF7CG10L6792
- Country Code: AT (Austria)
- Test Period: 31/12/2015 to 31/12/2018
- Test Type: EU-wide Stress Test
Key Financial Indicators
| Indicator | Actual (31/12/2015) | Baseline Scenario (31/12/2018) | Adverse Scenario (31/12/2018) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Interest Income (3y cumulative) | - | 11,381.77 | 10,001.67 |
| Gains or (Losses) on Financial Assets and Liabilities (3y cumulative) | - | 253.13 | -231.96 |
| Impairment or Reversal of Impairment (3y cumulative) | - | -2,529.24 | -4,790.20 |
| Profit or Loss for the Year (3y cumulative) | - | 1,834.81 | -1,481.42 |
| Coverage Ratio - Default Stock | 62.11% | 51.82% | 53.91% |
| Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital | 12,135.72 | 13,768.85 | 8,895.33 |
| CET1 Ratio (%) | 12.3% | 13.8% | 8.2% |
| Fully Loaded CET1 Ratio (%) | 12.2% | 13.5% | 8.0% |
| Tier 1 Capital | 12,135.72 | 13,915.85 | 9,042.33 |
| Total Risk Exposure Amount | 98,299.56 | 99,445.43 | 108,655.06 |
| Leverage Ratio (%) | 5.8% | 6.6% | 4.3% |
| Fully Loaded Leverage Ratio (%) | 5.8% | 6.5% | 4.2% |
| Total Leverage Ratio Exposures | 210,081.01 | 210,081.01 | 210,081.01 |
Main Findings
Default Stock Coverage Ratio
- The coverage ratio - default stock decreased from 62.11% in the actual scenario to 51.82% in the baseline scenario and 53.91% in the adverse scenario.
- This indicates that the bank’s capital adequacy is under pressure under stress conditions, particularly in the adverse scenario.
Capital Adequacy Ratios
- CET1 ratio dropped from 12.3% to 13.8% in the baseline scenario and 8.2% in the adverse scenario.
- Fully loaded CET1 ratio also decreased from 12.2% to 13.5% and 8.0% respectively.
- Leverage ratio declined from 5.8% to 6.6% in the baseline scenario and 4.3% in the adverse scenario.
- Fully loaded leverage ratio also fell to 6.5% and 4.2% respectively.
Key Risk Exposure Breakdown
| Category | Exposure Values (A-IRB/F-IRB) | Risk Exposure Amounts (A-IRB/F-IRB) | Stock of Provisions | Coverage Ratio - Default Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 44.0% |
| Institutions | 0/0 | 1,111/0 | 573/0 | 77.8% |
| Corporates | 0/0 | 33,464/1,379 | 21,384/0 | 50.8% |
| Corporates - Specialised Lending | 0/0 | 6,163/354 | 5,619/0 | 64.4% |
| Corporates - SME | 0/0 | 9,972/643 | 6,875/0 | 55.6% |
| Retail | 36,315/1,154 | 6,260/2,876 | 234/70 | 82.4% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 23,828/1,154 | 3,384/7,362 | 93/70 | 80.7% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - SME | 5,093/331 | 1,563/5,501 | 48/26 | 76.4% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - non-SME | 18,736/9,065 | 5,501/7,362 | 82/73 | 73.4% |
| Retail - Qualifying Revolving | 710/207 | 200/730 | 5/26 | 86.7% |
| Retail - Other Retail | 12,486/4,705 | 2,876/901 | 45/25 | 75.7% |
| Retail - Other Retail - SME | 3,478/1,071 | 945/373 | 29/9 | 88.9% |
| Retail - Other Retail - non-SME | 9,059/15,723 | 1,931/5,211 | 82/142 | 74.7% |
| Equity | 0/0 | 653/5,725 | 1,676/3,281 | 0/0 |
| Securitisation | -/- | -/- | -/- | -/- |
| Other non-credit obligation assets | 0/0 | 5,725/5,725 | 3,281/3,281 | 0/0 |
| IRB Total | 61,289/78,817 | 16,329/50,487 | 234/2,296 | 58.1% |
Country-Specific Summary (Selected Countries)
Czech Republic
- IRB Total: 12,725/78,817
- Risk Exposure Amounts: 6,260/2,812
- Stock of Provisions: 234/684
- Coverage Ratio - Default Stock: 58.8%
Slovakia
- IRB Total: 7,203/2,812
- Risk Exposure Amounts: 719/2,636
- Stock of Provisions: 16/42
- Coverage Ratio - Default Stock: 61.2%
Germany
- IRR Total: 608/4,864
- Risk Exposure Amounts: 141/2,215
- Stock of Provisions: 1/11
- Coverage Ratio - Default Stock: 62.8%
Hungary
- IRB Total: 1,977/1,557
- Risk Exposure Amounts: 1,663/1,785
- Stock of Provisions: 27/34
- Coverage Ratio - Default Stock: 47.9%
Key Insights
- The adverse scenario significantly impacts the bank's financial health, leading to a decrease in profit and a reduction in capital ratios.
- The coverage ratio under the adverse scenario is lower than the baseline, indicating that the bank may struggle to absorb losses in a severe economic downturn.
- Retail and corporate exposures are major contributors to the risk profile, with retail showing a higher proportion of default stock in both scenarios.
- Secured real estate loans have a lower coverage ratio compared to other segments, suggesting higher risk in this area.
- Non-defaulted exposures are generally larger than defaulted ones, but the ratio of provisions to defaulted stock is critical in assessing the bank's ability to manage credit risk.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载