2013年-世界发展银行全球_International_Comparative_Study___Engineering_Education_in_India_80页_2mb
报告摘要
Summary of International Comparative Study: Engineering Education in India
Core Content
This report, part of the World Bank's Discussion Paper Series, presents an analysis of the engineering education sector in India in comparison with other countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Brazil, Russia, and China (the BRICs). The study aims to provide reliable data and international benchmarks to inform future policy discussions, rather than offering specific policy recommendations.
Main Findings
-
Expansion of Engineering Institutions
- The number of engineering institutions in India more than doubled from 1,500 in 2006 to 3,400 in 2011, primarily due to the growth of private institutions.
- This rapid expansion has led to a low student and faculty ratio per institution (450 students and 20 faculty members).
- The 12th Five Year Plan emphasizes expanding existing institutions over creating new ones.
-
Engineering Student Numbers
- India has over 1.5 million engineering students, similar to Brazil, and the second-highest number globally after China.
- However, the ratio of engineering students per million population is the lowest among the countries studied, at 1,290.
- The proportion of engineering students among all higher education students is comparable to other countries, but lower than in the United States and the United Kingdom.
-
Faculty Qualifications
- The percentage of faculty with PhDs in India is low, with only about 20% of full-time faculty holding PhDs in Andhra Pradesh, which is the lowest among the countries studied.
- The share of engineering students pursuing PhDs is less than 1%, indicating a shortage of high-qualified faculty.
- The 12th Five Year Plan aims to increase the number of PhD students by 10 times and add 16,000 faculty members, reflecting the need to improve faculty qualifications.
-
Data and Information Systems
- Reliable data on engineering education in India is scarce, making it difficult to conduct robust analysis.
- The 12th Five Year Plan acknowledges the importance of participating in international surveys and evaluations to improve data availability and quality.
-
Research and Commercialization Outputs
- Despite the low number of PhD faculty, research outputs in India have been increasing, including publications and patents.
- However, the absolute number of patents remains low, with India having the fewest among the countries studied.
- The report highlights the need for stronger university-industry partnerships to enhance research and commercialization.
Key Information
- Scope of the Study: The study compares engineering education systems across India, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, Brazil, and Russia, focusing on institutions, students, faculty, education outputs, and research outcomes.
- Methodology: The study uses data from 2011 and other years, primarily from official sources and international databases.
- Reforms in India: The government has initiated reforms through the Technical Education Quality Improvement Program (TEQIP), promoting autonomy, decentralization, and private sector partnerships.
- Challenges: The engineering education system in India faces challenges related to access, equity, and quality. The affiliation system is seen as a barrier to quality improvement due to limited academic, financial, and management autonomy for affiliated colleges.
Comparative Insights
- The number of engineering institutions in India is significantly higher than in other countries, such as China (570 institutions), but the student-faculty ratio is low.
- The expansion of engineering education in India has been driven by private institutions, which now account for about 94% of all engineering institutions.
- The 12th Five Year Plan is aligned with the findings of the study, aiming to improve access, equity, and quality through strategic investments in education and research.
Conclusion
The report highlights the importance of addressing the challenges in India's engineering education system, particularly the lack of high-qualified faculty and the need for stronger university-industry collaboration. It underscores the value of international comparisons in informing policy decisions and emphasizes the need for a comprehensive management information system to support evidence-based reforms. The findings may serve as a foundation for future discussions and policy interventions in the sector.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载