20100630-IEA-Global_Gaps_in_Clean_Energy_RD_amp_D_40页_1mb
报告摘要
Summary of IEA Report for the Clean Energy Ministerial: Global Gaps in Clean Energy RD&D
Core Content
This report from the International Energy Agency (IEA) highlights the current gaps in global clean energy research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) and provides recommendations for enhancing international collaboration to address these challenges. The goal is to support the transition to a low-carbon energy system, ensuring energy security, climate change mitigation, and sustainable economic growth.
Main Points
1. IEA Overview
- The IEA was established in 1974 and operates as an autonomous agency.
- It promotes energy security and advises on sound energy policy among its 28 member countries.
- The report updates the findings from the 2009 IEA Global Gaps study and focuses on the role of RD&D in achieving global energy and environmental goals.
2. Public Expenditure on Energy RD&D
- Public RD&D spending on clean energy has increased, particularly due to "green" stimulus packages in 2009.
- In 2009, IEA member countries spent about USD 23 billion on clean energy RD&D, compared to USD 16 billion without stimulus.
- The increase in spending is not expected to be sustained in 2010.
- Public RD&D spending has generally declined in real terms since 1976, with a significant drop in fossil fuel research and an increase in renewables and energy efficiency.
3. Government Stimulus Commitments
- Major economies allocated over USD 520 billion to clean energy technologies in 2008-09, with USD 23 billion dedicated to RD&D.
- Only 21% of the promised stimulus spending had reached the energy sector by May 2010.
- The financial crisis caused a shift in private sector investment toward short-term, low-risk projects, reducing support for long-term, high-risk innovations.
4. Catalysing Private Finance
- Private investment in clean energy RD&D accounts for about 20% of total investment.
- Governments need to understand private finance mechanisms and design policies to attract more investment.
- Policy tools such as tax credits, production incentives, and public-private partnerships have proven effective in driving private investment.
5. Technology Development Stages and Funding
- Government funding is most critical for early-stage technology development.
- Private finance becomes more relevant as technologies progress toward commercialisation.
- The investment requirements for different stages (research, development, demonstration, deployment, commercialisation) are represented in a pyramid model (Figure 5).
6. Policy Stability and Instruments
- Frequent changes in LCET policies increase investor risk.
- Governments should ensure policy predictability and stability to encourage long-term investment.
- Effective policy instruments include:
- Fiscal incentives (e.g., tax credits, reduced taxes)
- Mandated blending requirements for biofuels
- Feed-in tariffs for renewables
- Carbon finance and green bonds
- Loan guarantees and public concessionary loans
- Government procurement to incentivise deployment
7. Private-Public Partnerships
- New public-private institutions are being explored to pool resources for large-scale demonstration projects.
- These institutions can support infrastructure development, initial capital, and risk mitigation for LCETs.
- Examples include the UK's Green Investment Bank and the US's proposed Clean Energy Deployment Administration.
8. Angel Investors and Venture Capital
- These entities are important for early-stage technology development.
- They help identify high-potential technologies but face intense competition for funding.
- Governments can support this phase through targeted initiatives, such as the UK's Carbon Trust and the US's ARPA-E.
9. Assessment of Low-Carbon RD&D Gaps
- The report estimates a significant gap between current public RD&D spending and the investment needed to achieve the BLUE Map scenario.
- The annual investment gap is between USD 40 billion and USD 90 billion, with half expected to come from public sources.
- The required public RD&D spending needs to increase by two to five times current levels to meet global energy and climate goals.
Key Information
Table 2: Estimated Global Gaps in Public Low-Carbon Energy RD&D
| Technology Area | Annual Investment Needed (USD million) | Annual Public RD&D Spending (USD million) | Estimated Annual RD&D Spending Gap (USD million) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced vehicles | 22,500 – 45,000 | 1,860 | 20,640 – 43,140 |
| Bioenergy | 1,500 – 3,000 | 740 | 760 – 2,260 |
| CCS | 9,000 – 18,000 | 540 | 8,460 – 17,460 |
| Energy efficiency (industry) | 5,000 – 10,000 | 530 | 4,470 – 9,470 |
| Higher-efficiency coal | 1,300 – 2,600 | 850 | 450 – 1,750 |
| Nuclear fission | 1,500 – 3,000 | 4,030 | - |
| Smart grids | 5,600 – 11,200 | 530 | 5,070 – 10,670 |
| Solar energy | 1,800 – 3,600 | 680 | 1,120 – 2,920 |
| Wind energy | 1,800 – 3,600 | 240 | 1,560 – 3,360 |
| Total across technologies | 50,000 – 100,000 | 10,000 | 40,000 – 90,000 |
Key Recommendations
- Implement intelligent domestic energy policies to align with global goals.
- Create new public-private institutions to fund large-scale demonstration projects.
- Accelerate cost reductions through expanded international RD&D collaboration.
Conclusion
The report re-affirms the need for a dramatic increase in public and private RD&D spending on low-carbon energy technologies. It underscores the importance of international collaboration, policy stability, and innovative financing mechanisms in achieving the necessary investments to drive the energy revolution and meet climate and energy security objectives.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载