2018年-查塔姆研究所_Consideration_of_an_International_Society_for_One_Health_7页_273kb

Meeting Summary: Consideration of an International Society for One Health (ISOH)

Core Content

This document summarizes the outcomes of a meeting held in London in June 2011, aimed at discussing the concept and implementation of One Health. The meeting was organized by Chatham House and led by Professor Martyn Jeggo and Professor John Mackenzie. It followed the First International Congress on One Health, held in Melbourne in February 2011, which was considered a success due to its inclusive nature and the opportunity for dialogue between scientists and policymakers.

The meeting focused on three main areas: Needs, Functions, and Organization of a potential International Society for One Health (ISOH). It aimed to determine whether the formation of an ISOH was necessary, or if a more general One Health association might be a better option.

Main Points and Outcomes

Background

• One Health has been a topic of discussion for over a decade, with notable initiatives such as the One Health Initiative, which has received over 500 endorsements.
• International collaborations, including between WHO, FAO, OIE, and others, have focused on diseases like avian and pandemic influenza.
• A series of meetings, including the 2009 Canadian and 2010 CDC events, identified seven key activity areas for One Health, such as training, information sharing, and capacity building.

Outcomes of Discussions on 'Needs'

• A framework for information-sharing and partnerships across disciplines and sectors was proposed.
• Case studies to demonstrate the value of a One Health approach were suggested.
• Credible economic data is needed to justify further funding.
• Education and training are essential for cultural change in the health sectors.
• Promotion of One Health, especially at the ministerial level, is required.
• A wide range of partnerships across all aspects of One Health should be established.
• A broad and inclusive definition of One Health is necessary.
• Surveillance systems between animal and human health should be linked, with a focus on both domestic and wildlife diseases.
• The value of linking surveillance systems was supported by reports from the World Bank and CDC.

Outcomes of Discussions on 'Functions'

• Organizing and implementing a One Health International Congress every two years.
• Sharing information on all aspects of One Health, including success stories and best practices.
• Widespread communication and advocacy for a One Health approach.
• Enhancing surveillance through cross-sectoral collaboration.
• Promoting One Health in education and training, involving all relevant sectors.
• Conducting socio-economic studies to demonstrate the value proposition of One Health.

Outcomes of Discussions on 'Organization'

• There was a debate over the structure and transparency of the Stone Mountain Working Groups.
• While some felt the groups were sufficient to address the needs, others argued for a more open and inclusive process.
• A truly open dialogue is essential to ensure global participation.
• A One Health Congress every two years is recommended.
• A single web portal for One Health information was identified as valuable.
• Thailand, Denmark, and the Netherlands offered to host the next congress, with Thailand recommended as the first choice.

Key Recommendations

• The report of the meeting should be widely distributed to share outcomes and agreed actions.
• Thailand is recommended to host the next International Congress on One Health in January 2013, with an open invitation for all participants.
• Representatives from Denmark and the Netherlands should join the Organizing Committee.
• An International Secretariat for the One Health Congress should be established to ensure continuity.
• The six Working Groups from the Stone Mountain meeting should continue to produce reports that address the identified needs.
• Participants are encouraged to join these groups to contribute to the development of actionable plans.
• The current One Health Initiative website should be used as the primary platform for information sharing.
• A new, independent website may be necessary in the future to serve as a central hub for One Health resources.

Conclusion

The meeting emphasized the importance of open dialogue, cross-sectoral collaboration, and inclusive governance in advancing the One Health agenda. While the formation of an ISOH was discussed, it was agreed that the current working groups and the existing One Health Initiative platform could serve as the foundation for future activities. The recommendations focus on strengthening the One Health framework through structured collaboration, transparent communication, and global participation.