EBA欧洲银行-DE_529900JZTYE3W7WQH904_16页_3mb
报告摘要
2014 EU-wide Stress Test Summary for DE - HASPA Finanzholding
Core Content Overview
The document presents the results of the 2014 EU-wide Stress Test for DE - HASPA Finanzholding, a German banking institution. It provides a detailed analysis of the bank's financial performance and capital adequacy under two scenarios: the Baseline Scenario and the Adverse Scenario, as of 31 December 2016. The data includes actual figures from 31 December 2013, and the impact of the stress test over a three-year period (2014-2016).
Key Figures
Actual Figures (as of 31 December 2013)
- Operating profit before impairments: 199 (min EUR)
- Impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 69 (min EUR)
- Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital: 3,930 (min EUR)
- Total Risk Exposure: 31,550 (min EUR)
- CET1 ratio: 12.5%
Adverse Scenario (as of 31 December 2016)
- 3-year cumulative operating profit before impairments: 507 (min EUR)
- 3-year cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 807 (min EUR)
- 3-year cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book: 13 (min EUR)
- Valuation losses due to sovereign shock after tax and prudential filters: 0 (min EUR)
- CET1 capital: 3,577 (min EUR)
- Total Risk Exposure: 33,317 (min EUR)
- CET1 ratio: 10.7%
Baseline Scenario (as of 31 December 2016)
- 3-year cumulative operating profit before impairments: 590 (min EUR)
- 3-year cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 402 (min EUR)
- 3-year cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book: 1 (min EUR)
- CET1 capital: 4,048 (min EUR)
- Total Risk Exposure: 32,296 (min EUR)
- CET1 ratio: 12.5%
Memorandum Items
- Common EU-wide CET1 Threshold (5.5%): 1,832 (min EUR)
- Total amount of instruments with mandatory conversion into ordinary shares (2014–2016): 0 (min EUR)
- Total Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments eligible for regulatory capital (CRR provisions): 0 (min EUR)
- CET1 Threshold (8.0%): 2,584 (min EUR)
Risk Exposure Breakdown (Baseline Scenario)
| Category | F-IRB Non-defaulted | F-IRB Defaulted | A-IRB Non-defaulted | A-IRB Defaulted | STA Non-defaulted | STA Defaulted | Risk Exposure F-IRB | Risk Exposure A-IRB | Risk Exposure STA | Value Adjustments F-IRB | Value Adjustments A-IRB | Value Adjustments STA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Institutions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corporates | 0 | 0 | 15,965 | 203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail | 0 | 0 | 8,729 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 8,309 | 0 | 2,927 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of | 277 | 0 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of | 8,032 | 0 | 2,830 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Qualifying Revolving | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail | 8,792 | 192 | 5,844 | 258 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 27 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: SME | 843 | 0 | 571 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: non-SME | 7,947 | 192 | 5,273 | 258 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 24 | 0 |
| Equity | 331 | 0 | 607 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Securitisation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other non-credit obligation assets | 1,194 | 0 | 929 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 43,085 | 396 | 25,575 | 548 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 136 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Risk Exposure Breakdown (Adverse Scenario)
| Category | F-IRB Non-defaulted | F-IRB Defaulted | A-IRB Non-defaulted | A-IRB Defaulted | STA Non-defaulted | STA Defaulted | Risk Exposure F-IRB | Risk Exposure A-IRB | Risk Exposure STA | Value Adjustments F-IRB | Value Adjustments A-IRB | Value Adjustments STA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Institutions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Corporates | 0 | 0 | 15,965 | 203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail | 0 | 0 | 8,729 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 8,309 | 0 | 2,927 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of | 277 | 0 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of | 8,032 | 0 | 2,830 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Qualifying Revolving | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail | 8,792 | 192 | 5,844 | 258 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 27 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: SME | 843 | 0 | 571 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: non-SME | 7,947 | 192 | 5,273 | 258 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 24 | 0 |
| Equity | 331 | 0 | 607 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Securitisation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other non-credit obligation assets | 1,194 | 0 | 929 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 48,268 | 397 | 28,359 | 549 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 137 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Summary of Main Points
- CET1 Capital and Ratio: The CET1 capital decreased slightly from 3,930 (12.5%) in 2013 to 3,577 (10.7%) in the adverse scenario by 2016, while it remained at 4,048 (12.5%) in the baseline scenario.
- Operating Profit: The cumulative operating profit before impairments increased in both scenarios, with 507 (adverse) and 590 (baseline) over the three-year period.
- Impairment Losses: Impairment losses were higher in the adverse scenario (807) than in the baseline (402), reflecting the impact of the stress test.
- Trading Book Losses: The adverse scenario recorded a cumulative loss of 13 in the trading book, while the baseline scenario showed a smaller loss of 1.
- Valuation Losses: No valuation losses due to sovereign shock were recorded in the adverse scenario.
- Risk Exposure: The total risk exposure increased in both scenarios, from 31,550 (2013) to 33,317 (adverse) and 32,296 (baseline) by 2016.
- LTV and Provisions: The loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and provisions varied across different categories, with higher impairment rates in the adverse scenario.
- Eligible Instruments: No instruments were eligible for conversion into CET1 or written down in the adverse scenario.
Conclusion
The 2014 EU-wide Stress Test highlights the resilience of DE - HASPA Finanzholding under both baseline and adverse scenarios. While the CET1 ratio dropped in the adverse scenario, the bank still met the minimum threshold of 5.5% at the end of 2016. The test also revealed the impact of stress on impairment losses and trading book losses, with the adverse scenario showing a more significant effect. The bank's capital structure and risk exposure remained within acceptable limits, indicating a robust financial position.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载