2025-06-12-Jefferies-软件与支付的最新动态;与Infinicept联合创始人的炉边谈话要点_8页_119kb
报告摘要
Payments, Processors & IT Services Equity Research Summary
Software-Led Payments Industry Trends
- Adoption of PayFac models is hindered by reduced sponsorship (post-Vantiv/Worldpay merger), rising capital costs, and worsening transaction margins/conditions.
- While a wave of software companies becoming PayFacs was once expected, limited adoption occurred due to the factors above.
- Stripe remains the default Acquirer for many software companies (ISVs), especially startups and developers.
- However, Stripe's economics become less favorable for larger ISVs ($50-100M volume) who encounter support limitations and may lack required vertical-specific risk settings/underwriting flexibility.
- Back-book migration from legacy referral model Acquirers is challenging due to superior merchant experiences/embedded platforms offering higher attach rates (~30%) and legal/technical constraints, including anti-solicitation clauses from Acquirers like Worldpay.
Infinicept: Embedded Payments Platform
- Launched LaunchPay platform offering an embedded payments solution.
- Differentiation: Takes on all payment risk (underwriting, fraud, chargebacks) rather than shifting liability to the ISV (like Stripe). This is crucial for high-ticket or complex verticals.
- Highly portable platform: ISVs can transition to full PayFac status or reassign merchants gradually, avoiding lock-in.
- Provides tailored underwriting by vertical/merchant profile and human oversight for edge cases missed by automation, offering flexibility for industries needing fine-tuned risk settings (e.g., Healthcare, Field Services).
Comparison: Stripe vs. Infinicept
- Stripe is dominant for early-stage, developer-led, or VC-backed companies due to ease of integration.
- Infinicept targets more complex verticals where Stripe-type platforms lack customization, human oversight, or risk management capabilities, and where scaling independent of a single platform is advantageous.
Company Valuation/Risks
- Adyen N.V.: Maintains a
BUYrating based on DCF, citing risks: slowed volume due to increased competition, macro risks, failed adoption of new products, and tech insourcing threats. - Fidelity National Information Services (FIS): Holds a
HOLDrating with a $80 price target (approx. 13x FY26 EPS). Risks highlighted are macro, regulatory, and competition, leading to a lowered recommendation. - Global Payments, Inc.: Maintains a
HOLDrating with a $75 price target (approx. 5x 2026 pro-forma adj EPS). Risks mentioned are macro, consumer spending, regulatory environment, and competition.
Analyst Certification
- The analysts certify that all views expressed accurately reflect their personal views and that no compensation was/will be received in relation to the recommendations/views in the report.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载