2012年-世界发展银行全球_Progress_on_Commercialized_Road_Management_in_Sub-Saharan_Africa_189页_5mb
报告摘要
Summary of "Progress on Commercialized Road Management in Sub-Saharan Africa"
Core Content
This document presents an analysis of progress in commercialized road management practices in seven Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries: Botswana, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Namibia, Tanzania, and South Africa. It is part of the Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Policy Program (SSATP), which aims to improve transport policy and capacity building in the region. The report evaluates the effectiveness of institutional reforms and commercialization efforts in road management, focusing on four key building blocks: Responsibility, Ownership, Financing, and Management.
Main Objectives
- To identify key issues and constraints affecting the commercialized management of road agencies in SSA.
- To provide basic guidelines for increasing managerial effectiveness and efficiency.
- To deepen the understanding of good practice in organizational reform for commercialized road management.
- To offer a quasi-theoretical model that can guide SSATP partner countries in setting up or restructuring road authorities.
Key Findings
Progress in Commercialization
The progress of commercialized road management in the seven countries varies significantly:
| Country | Rating (%) | Evaluation | Annual Increase in Paved Network in Good Condition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Botswana | 45.1 | Just satisfactory | -22.0 (1996–2007) |
| Cameroon | 43.8 | Just satisfactory | -6.0 (1999–2008) |
| Ethiopia | 66.0 | Good | +25.0 (2002–06) |
| Ghana | 68.2 | Good | +8.4 (2000–2006) |
| Namibia | 85.0 | Excellent | -10.0 (2000–2006) |
| Tanzania | 70.8 | Good | +28.0 (2004–08) |
| South Africa | 94.5 | Excellent | +2.0 (2005–08) |
- South Africa and Namibia are rated as "Excellent" in commercialization progress.
- Ethiopia, Ghana, and Tanzania are rated "Good."
- Botswana and Cameroon are rated "Just satisfactory," with declining road conditions.
Factors Influencing Progress
- South Africa and Namibia have made significant strides in commercialization, characterized by clear responsibilities, strong ownership, and effective management.
- Namibia has a sound legal framework and effective interaction with road users, but faces challenges due to insufficient maintenance funding.
- Ethiopia, Ghana, and Tanzania have made good progress but still face constraints in their management procedures.
- Botswana and Cameroon remain largely non-commercialized, operating as government departments under parent ministries, leading to inefficiencies and poor road conditions.
Key Principles for Successful Reform
Building Block 1: Responsibility
- The establishment of clearly defined responsibilities is essential for effective road management.
- Institutional responsibilities are often fragmented among multiple agencies and ministries, leading to inefficiencies.
- A coherent organizational structure, ideally under a single transport ministry, is needed to avoid overlapping responsibilities and conflicts of interest.
Building Block 2: Ownership
- Road boards should include a majority of private sector representatives to better represent user interests and promote sustainable funding.
- Board members should be adequately remunerated, adhere to ethical standards, and be knowledgeable about road management.
- Independent election of board members and the establishment of performance agreements are recommended to improve governance.
Building Block 4: Management
- Road Authorities should act as procurers and outsource producer functions to the private sector to increase efficiency.
- A flat matrix organizational structure, as seen in South Africa, is more conducive to efficiency than traditional multilayered structures.
- Reducing management levels and increasing responsibility spans are important for streamlining operations.
- The implementation of a road network management plan requires clear legislative frameworks and independent financial oversight.
Funding and Financial Management
- Routine and periodic maintenance funding is increasing but still insufficient for long-term sustainability.
- Road funds are often used for operating costs, but a better approach is to levy fees on contracts to ensure more sustainable financing.
- Financial management systems are in place, but independent auditing is recommended to ensure transparency and accountability.
Asset and Data Management
- Most road agencies have established road asset management systems (RAMS), but many struggle with local calibration and implementation.
- Data collection and asset management should be outsourced to competent local consultants to improve reliability and sustainability.
Recommendations
- Strengthen institutional frameworks through new legislation and clear responsibilities.
- Enhance board governance by ensuring majority private sector representation and performance-based remuneration.
- Streamline management structures to reduce layers and increase efficiency.
- Improve financial transparency through independent auditing and sustainable funding mechanisms.
- Promote technology and innovation in road management to reduce costs and improve service delivery.
- Increase public awareness through targeted campaigns and better communication with road users.
- Focus on performance measurement using regionally agreed indicators to enable interregional comparisons.
Conclusion
The report highlights the importance of institutional, management, and financial reforms in achieving effective and sustainable road management in SSA. While some countries have made significant progress, others lag behind due to bureaucratic structures, insufficient funding, and lack of autonomy. The success of commercialization depends on the ability of road agencies to achieve the four building blocks and to adapt to market-oriented practices.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载