2014年-世界发展银行全球_Crowdsourced_Geographic_Information_Use_in_Government_76页_4mb
报告摘要
CROWDSOURCED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USE IN GOVERNMENT
Core Content
This report, authored by researchers from the University College London (UCL) and the World Bank's Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), explores the use of crowdsourced geographic information (VGI) in government. It is part of the Open Data for Resilience Initiative (OpenDRI), which focuses on using open data to enhance disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. The report provides a comprehensive analysis of how governments can effectively integrate VGI into their operations and outlines key lessons from various case studies.
Main Viewpoints
- VGI as a Valuable Resource: Volunteered geographic information, generated by the public through crowdsourcing, is increasingly recognized as a useful and reliable source of data for governments.
- Government-Citizen Collaboration: There are established examples of successful collaboration between governments and the public in areas such as disaster risk reduction, land management, and biodiversity monitoring.
- Lessons from GIS History: Many of the challenges and opportunities faced in VGI projects are similar to those encountered during the early implementation of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in government.
- Organizational and Legal Barriers: While technical challenges can be overcome, organizational practices, regulations, and legal issues (such as licensing) are more likely to restrict the adoption of VGI.
- Best Practices for Crowdsourcing: Brabham (2013) outlines ten best practices for implementing crowdsourcing in government, including clear problem definition, transparency, and community engagement.
Key Information
- Definition of VGI: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) refers to geographic data collected and shared by the public, often through digital platforms.
- Scope of the Report: The report covers a range of case studies from various countries, including the Philippines, Indonesia, Nepal, Kenya, South Sudan, South Africa, and others.
- Case Study Structure: Each case study includes context, project description, positive and negative outcomes, and key lessons. They are categorized based on the direction of data flow between government and public (e.g., Public→Government, Government→Public→Government).
- Challenges: VGI projects face issues such as coverage bias, temporal bias, participation bias, sustainability, and legal concerns.
- Recommendations: The report emphasizes the need for clear communication, defined responsibilities, sustainable funding, and policies that support the use of VGI.
Research Methodology
- The research was conducted over six months.
- Seven initial case studies were developed collaboratively by the research team.
- A questionnaire was created to gather more data, and it was integrated into a website.
- The website was promoted through email lists and social media between late February and early May 2014.
- Incentives were offered to contributors, including donations to OpenStreetMap (OSM) or Amazon vouchers.
- Despite limited responses, the research team continued to identify and compile additional case studies, resulting in a total of 29.
Case Studies Overview
| Case Study | Interaction Type | Trigger Event | Domain | Organization | Actors | Data Sets | Process | Feedback | Goal | Side Effects | Contact Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participatory mapping and decision support tools for disaster risk reduction, the Philippines | Public→Government | Training and technical assistance | Disaster risk reduction | Local government units | NGOs, local authorities | Basemap information, InaSAFE impact modeling | Training, impact analysis | Improved disaster preparedness | To create basemap and perform impact analysis | - | - |
| Community Mapping for Exposure in Indonesia | Government→Public→Government | Natural disaster | Natural disaster preparedness | Local government, universities | Volunteers, NGOs | Spatial and attribute data | Data collection via OSM | Thematic maps for disaster planning | To reduce vulnerability to natural disasters | - | - |
| Flood preparedness through OpenStreetMap, Jakarta, Indonesia | Public→Government | Natural disaster | Disaster risk planning | Local authorities | University students | Critical infrastructure data | Paper maps, OSM data entry | Maps for flood risk planning | To improve flood preparedness | - | - |
| Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team mapping in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia | Public→Government | Natural disaster | Smart city development | World Bank/ICT, HOT | Local officials, volunteers | Updated topographic map | Workshops, OSM community building | Support for smart city initiatives | To create an updated topographic map | - | - |
| Mapping schools and health facilities in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal | Public→Government | Earthquake risk | Disaster preparedness | Kathmandu officials | NGOs | Education and health infrastructure data | Crowdsourced mapping | Humanitarian efforts support | To minimize future disaster impact | - | - |
| Informal settlement mapping, Map Kibera, Nairobi, Kenya | Public→Government | Urban development | Urban planning | Local NGOs | Residents, volunteers | GPS data, SMS/voice/video reports | GPS tracking, SMS reporting | Improved urban understanding | To improve reputation and provide accurate data | - | - |
| Mapping of South Sudan | Public→Government | Nation creation | Land management | Local organizations | Volunteers | Aerial imagery, local knowledge | Workshops, digitization | Recruitment of new volunteers | To create a temporal and up-to-date map | - | - |
| iCitizen, mapping service delivery, South Africa | Public→Government | Infrastructure management | Service delivery | Local government | Citizens | Geotagged photos, data points | Mobile data collection | Improved infrastructure reporting | To involve the public in service delivery | - | - |
| Skandobs, Scandinavian predator tracking system, Norway and Sweden | Public→Government | Legislation | Biodiversity monitoring | Government agencies | Volunteers | Observation data | Observation collection | Data for wildlife monitoring | To track predator populations | - | - |
| Corine Land Cover 2006 in OpenStreetMap, France | Public→Government | Data sharing | Environmental monitoring | Government, OSM | Volunteers | Land cover data | Data integration | - | To share and update land cover data | - | - |
| FixMyStreet for municipality maintenance information, UK | Public→Government | Infrastructure maintenance | Public space management | Local authorities | Citizens | Maintenance data | Reporting via mobile | Improved maintenance response | To report infrastructure issues | - | - |
| FINTAN vernacular placenames project, UK | Public→Government | Data collection | Cultural mapping | Ordnance Survey | Volunteers | Placenames data | Data collection via OSM | - | To collect and share placenames | - | - |
| Towns Conquer, Spain | Public→Government | Education | Toponym mapping | Instituto Geografico Nacional | Volunteers | Toponym data | Gamification, OSM integration | - | To map toponyms | - | - |
| National Biodiversity Data Centre, Ireland | Public→Government | Environmental monitoring | Biodiversity | Government | Volunteers | Biodiversity data | Data collection and sharing | - | To monitor biodiversity | - | - |
| Haiti disaster response | Public→Government | Natural disaster | Disaster response | NGOs, government | Volunteers | OSM data | Crowdsourced mapping | Support for humanitarian efforts | To improve disaster response | - | - |
| Mapping for Natural Resources Canada | Government→Public | Environmental data | Resource management | Government | Public | Environmental data | Data sharing | - | To improve resource management | - | - |
| Boston StreetBump, US | Government→Public | Urban management | Infrastructure monitoring | City authorities | Citizens | Road condition data | Mobile app, crowdsourced data | Improved road maintenance | To monitor road conditions | - | - |
| Open data initiative, New York City, US | Government→Public | Open data policy | Public information | Government | Public | Open data sets | Data sharing | - | To promote open data | - | - |
| Imagery to the Crowd, US | Government→Public | Humanitarian use | Crisis mapping | Government | Volunteers | Satellite imagery | Crowdsourced image analysis | - | To improve crisis mapping | - | - |
| OpenStreetMap community of practice, US | Government→Public | Data sharing | Mapping | US Census Bureau | Volunteers | OSM data | Community engagement | - | To support OSM community | - | - |
| Crowdsourcing The National Map, US | Government→Public | Data collection | National mapping | Government | Volunteers | National map data | Crowdsourced data collection | - | To create a national map | - | - |
| "Did you feel it?" US Geological Survey | Public→Government | Seismic events | Earthquake monitoring | USGS | Public | Seismic data | User reporting | - | To monitor earthquake impact | - | - |
| Places of Interest project, US | Government→Public | Tourism | Tourism development | National Park Service | Volunteers | Points of interest data | Crowdsourced data | - | To improve tourism services | - | - |
| California Roadkill Observation System (CROS), US | Public→Government | Wildlife monitoring | Environmental protection | Government | Volunteers | Roadkill data | Data collection via app | - | To monitor wildlife | - | - |
| Shelter Associates, slum mapping in India | Public→Government | Urban development | Slum mapping | NGOs | Volunteers | Slum data | Data collection and mapping | - | To improve urban planning | - | - |
| Crowdsourcing satellite imagery in Somalia | Public→Government | Humanitarian aid | Crisis mapping | NGOs | Volunteers | Satellite imagery | Image analysis | - | To support humanitarian efforts | - | - |
| Agricultural data collection and sharing by Community Knowledge Workers, Uganda | Public→Government | Agricultural planning | Rural development | Government | Volunteers | Agricultural data | Data collection | - | To improve agricultural data | - | - |
| Twitter use in Italian municipalities | Public→Government | Emergency response | Public safety | Municipalities | Citizens | Social media data | Data collection | - | To improve emergency response | - | - |
| Portland TriMet, transportation planner, US | Government→Public | Transportation planning | Urban mobility | Government | Volunteers | Transportation data | Data collection | - | To improve transportation planning | - | - |
Summary and Way Forward
The report concludes that while VGI is a promising tool for government, its successful implementation requires attention to organizational, legal, and technical factors. It recommends that governments should:
- Clearly define the problem and solution parameters.
- Engage with the online community and understand their motivations.
- Invest in user-friendly and well-designed tools.
- Develop policies that address legal and intellectual property rights.
- Promote transparency and responsiveness.
- Encourage community involvement and maintain user participation.
- Ensure sustainable funding and long-term support for VGI projects.
The report also highlights the importance of learning from past GIS implementations and adapting those lessons to the context of VGI. By doing so, governments can better harness the power of crowdsourced geographic information to improve decision-making, enhance public engagement, and build more resilient communities.
References and Sources
- Haklay, M., Antoniou, V., Basiouka, S., Soden, R., and Mooney, P. 2014, Crowdsourced geographic information use in government, Report to GFDRR (World Bank). London.
- Brabham, D. C. (2013) Best practices for crowdsourcing in government.
- OpenStreetMap (OSM) and various NGOs, government agencies, and international organizations contributed to the case studies.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载