2014 EU-wide Stress Test Summary for BE-KBC Group NV
Core Information
Bank Name: BE - KBC Group NV
LEI Code: 6B2PBRV1FCJDMR45RZ53
Summary: Adverse Scenario
Actual Figures as of 31 December 2013
Operating profit before impairments: 3,013 million EUR
Impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 2,277 million EUR
Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital: 11,777 million EUR
Total Risk Exposure: 92,873 million EUR
CET1 ratio: 12.7%
Outcome as of 31 December 2016
3-year cumulative operating profit before impairments: 3,259 million EUR
3-year cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 4,654 million EUR
3-year cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book: 1,353 million EUR
Valuation losses due to sovereign shock after tax and prudential filters: 112 million EUR
CET1 capital: 8,490 million EUR
Total Risk Exposure: 102,697 million EUR
CET1 ratio: 8.3%
Memorandum Items
Common EU-wide CET1 Threshold (5.5%): 5,648 million EUR
Total amount of instruments with mandatory conversion into ordinary shares (2014-2016): 0 million EUR
Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments eligible for regulatory capital: 725 million EUR
Of which: trigger above CET1 ratio in adverse scenario: 0 million EUR
Summary: Baseline Scenario
Actual Figures as of 31 December 2013
Operating profit before impairments: 3,013 million EUR
Impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 2,277 million EUR
CET1 capital: 11,777 million EUR
Total Risk Exposure: 92,873 million EUR
CET1 ratio: 12.7%
Outcome as of 31 December 2016
3-year cumulative operating profit before impairments: 4,953 million EUR
3-year cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 1,934 million EUR
3-year cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book: 945 million EUR
CET1 capital: 11,635 million EUR
Total Risk Exposure: 93,636 million EUR
CET1 ratio: 12.4%
Memorandum Items
Common EU-wide CET1 Threshold (8.0%): 7,491 million EUR
Exposure and Risk Analysis
LTV % (as of 31/12/2013)
Central banks and central governments: 61.5%
Institutions: 61.5%
Corporates: 61.5%
Corporates - Of Which: Specialised Lending: 61.5%
Corporates - Of Which: SME: 61.5%
Retail: 61.5%
Retail - Secured on real estate property: 59.2%
Retail - Other Retail: 61.5%
Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: SME: 61.5%
Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: non-SME: 61.5%
Equity: 61.5%
Exposure Values (as of 31/12/2013)
Category
F-IRB Non-defaulted
F-IRB Defaulted
A-IRB Non-defaulted
A-IRB Defaulted
STA Non-defaulted
STA Defaulted
Central banks and central governments
216
2
22,012
0
1,762
0
Institutions
4
0
727
0
102
0
Corporates
0
27
29,165
1,902
1,050
63
Corporates - Of Which: Specialised Lending
0
0
2,583
287
0
0
Corporates - Of Which: SME
0
27
12,179
1,226
0
0
Retail
0
0
54,722
6,438
1,841
59
Retail - Secured on real estate property
0
0
7,545
122
23
0
Retail - Other Retail
0
0
10,807
23
1,770
89
Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: SME
0
0
6,414
536
1,110
42
Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: non-SME
0
16
4,393
145
660
47
Equity
0
0
2,926
61
227
0
Securitisation
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other non-credit obligation assets
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
220
27
106,477
2,758
2,468
63
Risk Exposure Amounts (as of 31/12/2013)
Category
F-IRB Non-defaulted
F-IRB Defaulted
A-IRB Non-defaulted
A-IRB Defaulted
STA Non-defaulted
STA Defaulted
Central banks and central governments
1
20
3,940
0
2,357
0
Institutions
0
0
401
0
2,245
79
Corporates
0
0
0
0
48
1,121
Corporates - Of Which: Specialised Lending
0
0
651
0
379
22
Corporates - Of Which: SME
0
0
1,169
0
561
38
Retail
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Secured on real estate property
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Qualifying Revolving
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Other Retail
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: SME
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: non-SME
0
0
0
0
0
0
Equity
0
0
0
0
0
0
Securitisation
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other non-credit obligation assets
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
11,823
0
44,737
2,439
5,747
273
Value Adjustments and Provisions (as of 31/12/2013)
Category
F-IRB Non-defaulted
F-IRB Defaulted
A-IRB Non-defaulted
A-IRB Defaulted
STA Non-defaulted
STA Defaulted
Central banks and central governments
0
0
0
0
0
0
Institutions
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corporates
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corporates - Of Which: Specialised Lending
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corporates - Of Which: SME
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Secured on real estate property
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Qualifying Revolving
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Other Retail
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: SME
0
0
0
0
0
0
Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: non-SME
0
0
0
0
0
0
Equity
0
0
0
0
0
0
Securitisation
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other non-credit obligation assets
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
6
69
1,155
52
237
217
Securitisation and Re-securitisations Deducted from Capital
0 million EUR
Key Insights
CET1 Capital: Under the adverse scenario, CET1 capital decreased from 11,777 million EUR (as of 31/12/2013) to 8,490 million EUR (as of 31/12/2016), resulting in a CET1 ratio of 8.3%, which is below the EU-wide threshold of 5.5%.
Baseline Scenario: The CET1 capital remained relatively stable at 11,635 million EUR (as of 31/12/2016), with a CET1 ratio of 12.4%, above the threshold of 8.0%.
Impairment Losses: In the adverse scenario, impairment losses increased significantly from 2,277 million EUR to 4,654 million EUR over three years, indicating a higher risk of loan defaults.
Trading Book Losses: The adverse scenario also led to cumulative losses from the trading book of 1,353 million EUR, which could impact profitability.
Sovereign Shock: Valuation losses due to sovereign shock were recorded at 112 million EUR, highlighting the impact of government-related risks.
Risk Exposure: The total risk exposure increased from 92,873 million EUR to 102,697 million EUR, showing a rise in the bank's exposure to various risk categories.
Provisions and Coverage Ratios: The coverage ratio of default stock was generally lower in the adverse scenario, indicating a weaker capacity to absorb losses.