2011年-IMF国际货币组织全球_Government_Debt_Issuance_in_the_Euro_Area_The_Impact_of_the_Financial_Crisis_30页_1mb
报告摘要
Summary of "Government Debt Issuance in the Euro Area: The Impact of the Financial Crisis"
Core Content
This IMF Working Paper, authored by Mark De Broeck and Anastasia Guscina, analyzes the changes in government debt issuance practices in the 16 euro area countries and Denmark during the financial crisis of 2007–2009. The paper explores how the crisis affected the structure, frequency, and composition of debt issuance, as well as the role of macroeconomic factors and investor sentiment in these changes.
Main Viewpoints
-
Shift in Debt Issuance Practices: The financial crisis led to a significant shift away from the pre-crisis standard of competitive auctions of long-term, fixed rate debt denominated in domestic currency (DLTF debt). Governments increasingly resorted to shorter maturities, foreign currency denomination, and floating rate instruments.
-
Impact of the Crisis: The crisis had a pronounced effect on DLTF debt issuance, especially in countries with high deficit and debt levels. The negative impact was more significant in these countries, forcing them to assume more risk due to reduced investor appetite and higher risk premia.
-
Macroeconomic and Sentiment Factors: Lower inflation and higher economic growth supported the issuance of DLTF debt. Investor sentiment also played a role, with stronger sentiment associated with lower issuance levels and more favorable conditions for auctions.
-
Heterogeneity in Responses: The impact of the crisis varied across countries. Countries with already high debt and deficits were more affected, while those with moderate deficits showed a different pattern, where the debt stock and inflation were more significant in explaining changes in issuance composition.
Key Information
Database Overview
- A newly constructed database on primary market debt issuance was used, covering more than 3,000 debt issuances by central governments in the euro area and Denmark from 2007 to 2009.
- The database includes data on issuance and maturity dates, currency denomination, coupon structure, placement techniques, and issuance yields or prices.
- It accounts for both completed and cancelled auctions, and is organized by country and date of transaction.
Stylized Facts
- Increase in Gross Debt Issuance: All euro area countries and Denmark saw a significant increase in gross debt issuance during the crisis, with the euro zone's issuance as a share of GDP almost doubling.
- More Frequent and Larger Auctions: The frequency of auctions increased, and in some countries, the average size of issuances also increased.
- Spread Widening and Differentiation: Sovereign primary market spreads widened, especially in higher risk countries, reflecting concerns over debt sustainability and sovereign risk.
- Shift to International Placements and Syndication: Some countries increased their reliance on international placements and syndication, while others saw a reduction in these practices.
- Shorter Maturities: New debt issuances became shorter in maturity, influenced by both the need for liquidity and lower short-term interest rates.
- Less Local Currency Fixed Rate Debt: The share of local currency fixed rate debt decreased in several countries, with an increase in foreign currency and floating rate debt.
Table Summary (Changes in the Structure of Sovereign Borrowing)
| Country | Time Period | Auctions | Domestic | Short-term | Foreign currency | CPI indexed | Variable rate | DLTF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | 2007-2008H1 | 79.7 | 79.7 | 3.8 | 20.2 | 0 | 8.5 | 79.75 |
| Austria | 2008H2-2009 | 83.75 | 95.6 | 5.82 | 16.2 | 0 | 0.5 | 82.8 |
| Belgium | 2007-2008H1 | 78.1 | 100 | 21.3 | 0 | 0 | 3.63 | 78.69 |
| Belgium | 2008H2-2009 | 86.7 | 100 | 50.7 | 4.1 | 0 | 2.98 | 45.45 |
| Cyprus | 2007-2008H1 | 100 | 100 | 23.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.18 |
| Cyprus | 2008H2-2009 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.6 |
| Denmark | 2007-2008H1 | 100 | 100 | 85.14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.86 |
| Denmark | 2008H2-2009 | 65.2 | 71 | 23.5 | 34.8 | 0 | 0 | 41.6 |
| Finland | 2007-2008H1 | 38.9 | 72 | 0 | 27.8 | 0 | 0 | 72.2 |
| Finland | 2008H2-2009 | 62.2 | 80 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 80 |
| France | 2007-2008H1 | 98.73 | 100 | 64.2 | 0 | 5.41 | 0 | 35.8 |
| France | 2008H2-2009 | 99.56 | 100 | 71.4 | 0 | 2.25 | 0 | 28.56 |
| Germany | 2007-2008H1 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 4.08 | 0 | 100 |
| Germany | 2008H2-2009 | 99.5 | 100 | 23.73 | 0.53 | 2.94 | 0 | 75.74 |
| Greece | 2007-2008H1 | 54.6 | 95.6 | 3.3 | 0 | 12.2 | 4.4 | 92.3 |
| Greece | 2008H2-2009 | 46.6 | 95.4 | 13.46 | 1.8 | 0 | 10.78 | 81.91 |
| Ireland | 2007-2008H1 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Ireland | 2008H2-2009 | 67.9 | 100 | 47.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52.6 |
| Italy | 2007-2008H1 | 97.94 | 99.46 | 37.55 | 0.52 | 4.07 | 4.95 | 61.7 |
| Italy | 2008H2-2009 | 98.4 | 99.7 | 36.2 | 0.29 | 2.94 | 4.2 | 63.53 |
| Malta | 2007-2008H1 | 100 | 100 | 89.53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.46 |
| Malta | 2008H2-2009 | 100 | 100 | 79.78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.22 |
| Netherlands | 2007-2008H1 | 100 | 100 | 75.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.44 |
| Netherlands | 2008H2-2009 | 100 | 100 | 82.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17.9 |
| Portugal | 2007-2008H1 | 89.9 | 100 | 51.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48.1 |
| Portugal | 2008H2-2009 | 88.5 | 98.8 | 61.97 | 1.22 | 0 | 0 | 36.81 |
| Slovakia | 2007-2008H1 | 93.84 | 93.84 | 7.69 | 6.15 | 0 | 0 | 86.15 |
| Slovakia | 2008H2-2009 | 95.65 | 95.65 | 23.78 | 0 | 0 | 7.55 | 71.87 |
| Slovenia | 2007-2008H1 | 61.82 | 81.8 | 40.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40.9 |
| Slovenia | 2008H2-2009 | 77.89 | 100 | 77.89 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.11 |
| Spain | 2007-2008H1 | 95.8 | 99.2 | 48.5 | 0.83 | 0 | 0 | 50.62 |
| Spain | 2008H2-2009 | 93.3 | 98.8 | 36.6 | 1.17 | 0 | 1.31 | 62.21 |
Econometric Analysis
- The paper uses a dynamic panel data model with random country effects to analyze the determinants of total debt issuance.
- The preferred specification shows that the crisis dummy is not statistically significant, but changes in sentiment and inflation have significant negative impacts on total issuance.
- The crisis had a more pronounced negative effect on DLTF issuance in high debt and high deficit countries, while moderate deficit countries showed a different pattern, where the debt stock and inflation were more important.
- The results highlight the importance of macroeconomic conditions and investor sentiment in shaping the response of governments to the crisis.
Conclusion
The paper concludes that the financial crisis significantly altered government debt issuance practices in the euro area and Denmark. The shift from DLTF debt to other instruments reflects the increased risk and reduced investor confidence. The analysis also suggests that the crisis led to a more complex risk allocation between sovereigns and investors, which cannot be fully captured by secondary market spreads alone. The study provides a foundation for further research into the links between primary market issuance and both primary and secondary market conditions.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载