2014年-世界发展银行全球_Strengthening_Kazakhstans_Education_Systems___An_Analysis_of_PISA_2009_and_2012_52页_1mb
报告摘要
Summary of Kazakhstan's PISA Performance Analysis (2009-2012)
Core Content
This report analyzes Kazakhstan's performance in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 and 2012, focusing on improvements in math and science, persistent challenges in reading, and the determinants of education quality. It also provides policy recommendations for enhancing educational outcomes.
Main Findings
Improvements in Math and Science
- Kazakhstan's PISA 2012 performance in math and science improved significantly compared to 2009.
- The gains in math and science are equivalent to more than half a year of schooling.
- These improvements reduced the gap with other countries in the Europe and Central Asia (ECA) region and OECD countries.
Reading Performance
- Reading performance improved only marginally, with a 3-point increase from 2009 to 2012.
- Overall reading achievement remains low, and some groups performed worse in 2012.
- The reading gap with the ECA average is about 1 year of schooling, and with OECD it is about 2 years.
Performance Disparities
- Gender disparities: Girls outperformed boys in reading by the equivalent of one full year of schooling, while there was no significant gender gap in math or science.
- Socioeconomic disparities: The gap between high and low socioeconomic status (SES) students is large, equivalent to 1.5 years of schooling.
- Urban-rural disparities: Students in urban areas generally outperformed their rural counterparts.
- Language disparities: Students in Russian language schools outperformed those in Kazakh language schools by 1.5 years in reading and 1 year in math.
- School type disparities: Students in professional schools (technical vocational education) lag behind peers in basic and general secondary schools by more than 1.5 years in reading and 1 year in math.
PISA Methodology and Context
- PISA assesses 15-year-olds in math, science, and reading every three years.
- The scoring system is standardized with a mean of 500 points and a standard deviation of 100 points for OECD countries.
- Kazakhstan's PISA 2012 results show a significant improvement in math and science but remain below the ECA and OECD averages.
Key Determinants of Education Quality
- Public Education Expenditures: Kazakhstan spends the least on education per pupil among ECA PISA 2012 participants, despite a GDP per capita close to the ECA average.
- Expenditure vs. Performance: While higher expenditures may not guarantee better outcomes, the report emphasizes the need to align spending with effective policy reforms.
- Teacher Practices and Learning Strategies: Teachers in Kazakhstan face challenges in connecting classroom knowledge to real-life contexts and encouraging effective learning strategies.
- Preschool Participation: In Kazakhstan, preschool attendance does not significantly impact student achievement at age 15, unlike in most other countries.
Policy Recommendations
-
Improve Basic Reading Skills:
- Reading is the greatest challenge in Kazakhstan's education system.
- Implement a program to train teachers in reading instruction, maximize instruction time, provide appropriate books, and ensure mother tongue-based instruction.
- Regular classroom assessments should be conducted to identify and address learning gaps early.
-
Develop a Comprehensive Early Childhood Development (ECD) Program:
- Focus on at-risk groups, especially those aged 0-3, to ensure cognitive and non-cognitive skill development.
- Integrate health, nutrition, and social services for young children.
- Improve the transition from preschool to primary school through quality programs.
-
Establish an Integrated Assessment System:
- Align assessments with the curriculum and ensure objectivity and fairness.
- Use both national and international assessments (like PISA) to monitor student progress and inform policy decisions.
- Incorporate formative and interim assessments to track mastery of specific skills.
Conclusion
Kazakhstan has made notable progress in math and science since 2009, but reading remains a major challenge. The report highlights the need for targeted interventions to address disparities among students based on SES, gender, location, and language. Improving teacher effectiveness, enhancing preschool quality, and implementing a more integrated assessment system are critical steps toward achieving better educational outcomes and reducing inequality.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载