那提西银行-全球-股票市场-股东回报不可能既高又无风险-20180403-5页_558kb

Flash Economics Summary

Core Content

The document discusses the economic trend in Anglo-Saxon capitalism, particularly in the United States, where shareholder returns are high and low-risk. This trend is associated with a decline in the wage share of GDP and an increasing burden of corporate risk on employees. The analysis highlights that this distribution of risk and reward is not only ethically questionable but also economically inefficient.

Main Views

• Shareholder Return Trends:
  In the U.S., corporate profitability has been growing, and it has become more resilient during economic downturns. For instance, profits declined sharply in 2000 but only slightly in 2008.

  • Return on equity (RoE) has been increasing relative to the risk-free interest rate (e.g., 10-year Treasury rate).
  • This suggests that shareholders are receiving higher returns with lower risk exposure.

• Risk and Reward Imbalance:

  • Corporate risk (such as variability in production and commodity prices) is increasingly borne by employees rather than shareholders.
  • During recessions, employment levels adjust drastically, and real wages decline, which stabilizes corporate profitability.
  • This creates an inefficient equilibrium in the economy, as employees are not being compensated with a risk premium for the risks they take on.

• Moral Hazard and Disincentive Effects:

  • Moral Hazard: Shareholders benefit from risk-free returns, leading them to underestimate or ignore corporate risk, which can result in reckless decision-making.
  • Disincentive Effect: Employees, who bear more risk, are not adequately rewarded, reducing their incentive to work hard or innovate.

Key Information

• Economic Inefficiency: The current distribution of risk and reward is inefficient because employees, who are taking on more risk, are not receiving the corresponding returns.
• Ethical and Political Concerns: While the document primarily focuses on economic inefficiency, it acknowledges that the situation raises ethical concerns and could be politically dangerous.
• Data and Charts:
  • Chart 1: U.S. profits after tax, interest, and dividends as a percentage of nominal GDP.
  • Chart 2: U.S. RoE and 10-year Treasury interest rate as a percentage.
  • Chart 3: Income distribution trends showing a decline in employees' share.
  • Chart 4A and B: Employment adjustments and real wage declines during and after recessions.

Disclaimer and Legal Notes

• The document is intended for professional and qualified investors only and is strictly confidential.
• It is not a personalized investment recommendation and does not constitute a financial analysis.
• No liability is accepted by Natixis for the accuracy, completeness, or relevance of the information provided.
• The document is based on public information and does not take into account specific tax or accounting rules.
• The views expressed are personal opinions of the authors and may differ.
• The document is subject to regulatory supervision in various jurisdictions, including the ECB, ACPR, AMF, FCA, and others.
• The stocks mentioned may be subject to specific disclaimers, which can be accessed via the provided link.

Conclusion

The current economic structure in the U.S., where shareholders enjoy high, risk-free returns while employees bear corporate risk, is inefficient and potentially harmful. It creates a moral hazard for shareholders and a disincentive for employees, leading to an imbalance in the economy that needs to be addressed.