战略与国际研究中心-Missile-Defense-Project-Newsletter_1页_299kb

FY2017 Missile Defense Agency Budget Tracker Summary

Core Content Overview

The FY2017 Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Budget Tracker outlines the requested and proposed budget allocations across various programs and initiatives, including Operations & Maintenance, Procurement, RDT&E (Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation), and MILCON (Military Construction). The document provides a comparative view of the President's Budget (PB Request), House NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act), and the marks from the House Armed Services Committee (HAC-D), Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), and Senate Committee on Appropriations (SAC-D).

Key Budget Categories and Allocations

1. Operations & Maintenance (OM)

• AEGIS BMD: $73.039 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• THAAD: $72.099 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Midcourse: $172.556 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Sensors: $129.281 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)

Total OM Budget: $346.973 million

2. Procurement

• AEGIS Ashore: $57.493 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• AEGIS BMD: $528.801 million (House NDAA) vs. $463.801 million (PB Request) vs. $513.801 million (SAC-D)
• AEGIS BMD Hardware and Software: $50.098 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• BMDS AN/TPY-2 Radars: $5.503 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Iron Dome: $62.000 million (House NDAA) vs. $42.000 million (PB Request) vs. $62.000 million (SAC-D)
• Arrow Upper Tier: $120.000 million (House NDAA) vs. $120.000 million (SAC-D)
• David's Sling: $150.000 million (House NDAA) vs. $150.000 million (SAC-D)
• Redesigned Kill Vehicle Long Lead Materials: $50.000 million (SASC)
• THAAD: $419.608 million (SAC-D) vs. $369.608 million (PB Request) vs. $330.344 million (House NDAA)

Total Procurement Budget: $1,225.054 million

3. RDT&E (Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation)

• Cyber Security: $0.969 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Advanced Concepts and Performance Assessment: $17.880 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Weapons Technology: $71.843 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D) vs. $49.643 million (SAC-D)
• Advanced C4ISR: $3.626 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Advanced Research: $23.433 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Special Programs - MDA Technology: $108.745 million (PB Request) vs. $11.795 million (House NDAA) vs. $11.795 million (SAC-D)
• BMD Terminal Defense: $206.834 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• BMD Midcourse Defense: $927.080 million (PB Request) vs. $917.080 million (House NDAA) vs. $972.780 million (SAC-D)
• BMD Sensors: $275.077 million (PB Request) vs. $221.977 million (House NDAA) vs. $230.077 million (SAC-D)
• BMD Enabling Programs: $411.594 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Special Programs: $321.607 million (PB Request) vs. $304.707 million (House NDAA) vs. $304.677 million (SAC-D)
• BMD AEGIS: $969.066 million (PB Request) vs. $939.066 million (House NDAA) vs. $924.066 million (SAC-D)
• STSS: $32.129 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• BMDS Space Program: $20.690 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• BMD C2BMC: $469.617 million (PB Request) vs. $429.378 million (House NDAA) vs. $443.517 million (SAC-D)
• BMD Joint Warfighter: $47.776 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• MDIOC: $54.750 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Regarding Trench: $8.785 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Sea Based X-Band Radar: $68.787 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D) vs. $88.787 million (SAC-D)
• Israeli Cooperative: $293.835 million (PB Request) vs. $268.735 million (House NDAA) vs. $268.735 million (SAC-D)
• BMD Test: $303.441 million (PB Request) vs. $291.441 million (House NDAA) vs. $296.441 million (SAC-D)
• BMD Targets: $563.576 million (PB Request) vs. $538.076 million (House NDAA) vs. $531.976 million (SAC-D)
• Technology Maturation Initiatives: $105.266 million (PB Request) vs. $74.392 million (House NDAA) vs. $90.266 million (SAC-D)
• Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR): $162.012 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Improved Homeland Defense Interceptors: $349.148 million (PB Request) vs. $244.148 million (House NDAA) vs. $249.346 million (SAC-D)
• BMD Terminal Defense Segment Test: $63.444 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Aegis SM-3 Blk IIA: $106.038 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• BMD Midcourse Segment Test: $56.481 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D) vs. $62.781 million (SAC-D)
• Multiple-Object Kill Vehicle: $126.513 million (PB Request) vs. $56.513 million (House NDAA) vs. $121.513 million (SAC-D)
• Common Kill Vehicle (Taken from MOKV): $71.513 million (SAC-D)
• Management Headquarters: $56.160 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D) vs. $31.160 million (House NDAA)

Total RDT&E Budget: $4,496.581 million

4. MILCON (Military Construction)

• Long Range Discrimination Radar (LRDR), Phase I, Increment I: $155.000 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Test Support Facility (Major MILCON): $11.670 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Missile Defense Complex Switchgear Facility: $9.560 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Unspecified Minor Construction: $2.414 million (PB Request, House NDAA, HAC-D, SASC, SAC-D)
• Planning and Design: $15.000 million (House NDAA)

Total MILCON Budget: $183.244 million

MDA Total Budget

• PB Request: $7,506.879 million
• House NDAA: $8,401.879 million
• HAC-D Mark: $7,802.575 million
• SASC Mark: $7,756.879 million
• SAC-D Mark: $8,083.097 million

Main Observations

• The House NDAA proposed the highest total budget at $8,401.879 million, significantly higher than the PB Request.
• The SAC-D Mark also proposed a higher budget than the PB Request at $8,083.097 million.
• There are notable differences in allocations between the various committees, especially in Procurement and RDT&E.
• THAAD and AEGIS BMD show varied levels of support across the committees.
• Technology development and test programs are emphasized in the RDT&E category, with some programs receiving increased funding in the House NDAA and SAC-D marks.

Key Programs and Their Funding Trends

Program	PB Request	House NDAA	SAC-D Mark
AEGIS BMD	$463.801	$528.801	$513.801
THAAD	$369.608	$330.344	$419.608
BMD Midcourse Defense	$927.080	$917.080	$972.780
BMD Sensors	$275.077	$221.977	$230.077
BMD Test	$303.441	$291.441	$296.441
Israeli Cooperative	$293.835	$268.735	$268.735
Improved Homeland Defense Interceptors	$349.148	$244.148	$249.346
Multiple-Object Kill Vehicle	$126.513	$56.513	$121.513
Sea Based X-Band Radar	$68.787	$65.787	$88.787

Conclusion

The FY2017 MDA Budget Tracker highlights the importance of missile defense systems, technology development, and test and evaluation in the U.S. defense strategy. The House NDAA and SAC-D Mark propose higher budgets than the PB Request, indicating potential increases in funding for key programs. However, the SASC Mark shows a more moderate approach, aligning closer with the original request. The MILCON category is relatively stable, with only minor variations in funding. Overall, the document serves as a critical reference for understanding the budgetary priorities and funding trends for the Missile Defense Agency in FY2017.