2008年-世界发展银行全球_Potential_Impact_of_Higher_Food_Prices_on_Poverty___Summary_Estimates_for_a_Dozen_West_and_Central_African_Countries_33页_189kb
报告摘要
Summary of "Potential Impact of Higher Food Prices on Poverty: Summary Estimates for a Dozen West and Central African Countries"
Core Content
This paper analyzes the potential impact of rising food prices on poverty in a dozen West and Central African countries, focusing on short-term effects. It uses household survey data to estimate how increases in the prices of key food items—such as rice, wheat, maize, vegetable oil, sugar, and milk—could affect poverty levels, particularly for households already in poverty.
Main Findings
- Net Importers are Vulnerable: Most West and Central African countries are net importers of food, which means that the negative impact on consumers outweighs the positive impact on local producers.
- Magnitude of Impact Varies: The effect of higher food prices on poverty is not uniform across countries. Countries with higher food consumption shares (e.g., Niger, Democratic Republic of Congo) are likely to experience more severe poverty impacts.
- Poverty Deepening: A large share of the poverty increase comes from deeperening the poverty of already poor households rather than increasing the number of poor households.
- Key Poverty Measures:
- Headcount Index: Measures the proportion of the population in poverty.
- Poverty Gap: Measures the depth of poverty, i.e., the average distance from the poverty line.
- Squared Poverty Gap: Measures the severity of poverty, giving more weight to the poorest households.
Methodology
- Short-Term Focus: The analysis focuses on the immediate effects of food price increases on household consumption and production, without considering long-term wage adjustments or other indirect effects.
- Assumptions:
- A price increase leads to a proportional reduction in consumption.
- Producer gains are assumed to be equivalent to consumption losses.
- Auto-consumed food (produced by farmers for their own use) is not considered in the simulations.
- Price Increases Considered: The study evaluates the impact of a 25% and 50% increase in food prices.
- Data Sources: Uses the most recent household surveys (2003–2007) for each country to estimate consumption patterns and poverty impacts.
Country-Specific Impacts
-
Headcount Index:
- A 50% price increase could raise the headcount of poverty by 2.5–4.4 percentage points nationally.
- Urban areas generally experience higher increases than rural areas, except in countries like Ghana, Senegal, and Liberia, where rural areas are more affected due to high reliance on imported food.
- In some countries, such as Senegal, the impact is largest in urban areas outside the capital city.
-
Poverty Gap and Squared Poverty Gap:
- The poverty gap increases more in rural areas than in urban areas, especially for the squared poverty gap.
- The poverty gap increases by 2–31% across countries, with Senegal showing the highest increase (31%).
- The squared poverty gap increases even more, indicating greater severity of poverty for the poorest households.
Key Insights
- Producer Impact is Limited: In most countries, the positive impact of higher prices on producers is small compared to the negative impact on consumers.
- Policy Implications:
- Policy responses should prioritize helping the already poor who are most affected by price increases.
- The headcount index alone is insufficient to capture the full extent of poverty impacts; the poverty gap and squared poverty gap provide more nuanced insights.
- The impact is not linear with price increases, but is generally monotonic, allowing for interpolation in policy analysis.
Conclusion
The paper concludes that rising food prices have a significant negative impact on poverty in West and Central Africa, particularly for the poorest households. The effects are more pronounced in rural areas when measured by poverty depth and severity. Policy responses should therefore focus on mitigating the effects on the most vulnerable populations rather than just reducing the number of poor households. The findings are part of a broader study on food price crises and their policy implications in Africa.
References
- JEL Categories: I32, D1, Q12
- Keywords: food price, poverty, Africa
Summary Table of Key Impacts
| Country | Headcount Increase (50% price rise) | Poverty Gap Increase (50% price rise) | Squared Poverty Gap Increase (50% price rise) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Republic of Congo | 4.4 percentage points | 2% | 0.6 percentage points |
| Togo | 4.4 percentage points | 6% | 0.9 percentage points |
| Burkina Faso | 4.4 percentage points | 7% | 1.1 percentage points |
| Ghana | 4.4 percentage points | 7% | 0.9 percentage points |
| Guinea | 4.4 percentage points | 8% | 0.9 percentage points |
| Nigeria | 4.4 percentage points | 8% | 0.9 percentage points |
| Sierra Leone | 4.4 percentage points | 8% | 0.9 percentage points |
| Mali | 4.4 percentage points | 13% | 1.2 percentage points |
| Niger | 4.4 percentage points | 14% | 1.3 percentage points |
| Liberia | 4.4 percentage points | 16% | 1.5 percentage points |
| Gabon | 4.4 percentage points | 17% | 1.6 percentage points |
| Senegal | 4.4 percentage points | 31% | 2.2 percentage points |
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载