德银-美股-宏观经济-美联储政策框架：价格（水平）是正确的吗？-20171121-Deutsche_Bank-US_Economic_Perspectives：Fed_policy_framework，Is_the_price（level）right_22页_761kb

Summary of Fed Policy Framework Debate

Core Content

The Federal Reserve is currently considering a re-evaluation of its policy framework, which has historically focused on targeting a 2% inflation rate. This debate has gained momentum among Fed officials, including regional presidents and former chairmen like Bernanke, and is expected to be reflected in upcoming minutes. The central question is whether the Fed should maintain its current inflation-targeting framework or explore alternative approaches that may enhance monetary policy effectiveness in a low r-star (neutral real fed funds rate) environment.

Main Reasons for the Debate

• Low r-star and Zero Lower Bound (ZLB) Risk: There is a growing consensus that r-star is likely to remain low, increasing the probability of hitting the ZLB. This reduces the effectiveness of the current framework in future economic downturns.
• Leadership Turnover: The near-wholesale turnover in Fed leadership, including the upcoming chairmanship of Jay Powell, creates an opportunity for a re-think of the policy framework.
• Economic Calm: The current economic environment is relatively stable, with solid growth and full employment, making it an appropriate time to debate changes before the next recession.
• Constraints on Extraordinary Policies: The Fed may face political and technical constraints in the future use of quantitative easing (QE), so a framework that reduces reliance on such measures would be preferable.

Key Policy Framework Options

1. Higher Inflation Target

• Definition: Raising the inflation target from 2% to 3% or 4%.
• Pros:
  • Incremental change, consistent with the current framework.
  • Well-understood and allows flexibility in responding to temporary inflation shocks.
  • May reduce the likelihood of hitting the ZLB.
• Cons:
  • Politically unpalatable due to concerns over reduced purchasing power.
  • Could lead to greater inflation volatility and economic costs.
  • Inflation expectations may not re-anchor if the Fed shows discretion in raising the target.
• Market Implications:
  • Higher inflation risk premium.
  • Markets may price in less QE in the future.
  • Requires more dovish monetary policy initially to build credibility.

2. Price Level Targeting

• Definition: Targeting the overall price level rather than the inflation rate.
• Pros:
  • Reduces the likelihood of hitting the ZLB.
  • Forces the Fed to commit to more accommodative policy after a recession.
  • Helps stabilize long-term inflation expectations.
• Cons:
  • More complex and potentially confusing for the public.
  • Less flexibility in responding to transitory inflation shocks.
  • May lead to greater volatility in short-term inflation expectations.
• Market Implications:
  • Slight increase in long-term inflation risk premium.
  • Reduces the likelihood of hitting near-zero interest rates during downturns.
  • May lead to more volatility in yield curves, which could negatively impact the real economy.

3. Nominal GDP Targeting

• Definition: Targeting the growth rate or level of nominal GDP.
• Pros:
  • Relies on observable data (nominal GDP) rather than unobservable quantities like potential GDP or NAIRU.
  • Simplifies messaging around the dual mandate.
  • Provides more policy flexibility during recessions.
  • Can mimic the effects of a higher inflation target in certain scenarios.
• Cons:
  • Potential for asymmetric misses (e.g., high inflation with low GDP growth) that may not feel successful to the public.
  • Risk of time-inconsistency if the Fed adjusts the target in response to structural changes.
  • May require more communication and could face criticism for being too rigid.
• Market Implications:
  • Could reduce the need for unconventional monetary policies.
  • May lead to more stability in long-term inflation expectations.
  • Could increase short-term volatility in the yield curve.

Conclusion

While all proposed frameworks have drawbacks, the debate suggests a shift in how the Fed perceives its role in maintaining price stability and full employment. A higher inflation target is viewed as the least likely change due to political and economic concerns. Price level and nominal GDP targeting are considered more viable, though both introduce complexities and risks. The Fed is expected to remain cautious, with inertia likely keeping the current framework in place for some time. However, the discussion is expected to intensify, with market participants closely watching for signals of potential changes.