2013年-世界发展银行全球_Sri_Lanka___Justice_Sector_Review_71页_1mb
报告摘要
Sri Lanka Justice Sector Review Summary
Core Content
This report provides an overview of the Sri Lankan justice sector, with a particular focus on its performance in adjudicating commercial cases. It outlines the structure of the court system, the challenges in case handling, and suggests potential reforms to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The review is conducted by the World Bank and includes insights from both government and private sector stakeholders.
Main Purpose
The primary objective of the review is to identify the factors contributing to inefficiency in Sri Lanka's courts when handling commercial cases and to propose a potential reform program that can enhance the judiciary's performance in this area. The report also evaluates the current state of the justice system and highlights the need for systemic improvements to support economic growth and investment.
Key Findings
Court System Structure
- Sri Lanka has a three-tiered court system: Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, Provincial High Courts, and first instance District and Magistrate Courts.
- The Colombo Commercial High Court (CCHC) is a specialized court established in 1996 to handle commercial transactions, including company law, intellectual property, and admiralty matters.
- The CCHC is considered more competent and efficient than District Courts, which handle "money matters" and are less equipped for complex commercial cases.
Judicial Performance and Backlog
- The court system is not effectively managing an increasing number of cases, with a backlog primarily driven by partition and land disputes.
- As of 2012, 91% of criminal cases and 70% of civil cases had been in court for less than five years, indicating that the backlog is not as severe as it could be.
- The CCHC processes cases at a rate comparable to new filings, with no significant backlog, while District Courts have substantial backlogs, especially in Colombo and Kandy.
- The average time to enforce contracts in Sri Lanka is 1318 days, significantly higher than countries like Thailand and Malaysia.
Judicial Management and Personnel
- The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and Ministry of Justice (MoJ) jointly manage the courts.
- There is a lack of formal performance evaluation systems and limited training capacity, particularly for commercial matters.
- The Judicial Training Institute can train only about 25 trainee judges per year and holds one-day seminars for another 25 judges.
- Judges often lack expertise in commercial law, especially those outside the CCHC.
Infrastructure and Technology
- Court infrastructure is limited, with many buildings being old bungalows and not suitable for modern court operations.
- Record-keeping facilities are inadequate, contributing to delays and opportunities for corruption.
- Automation is minimal, with only a small case tracking system tested in some courts.
- There are no plans to implement a full automated case management system.
Legal and Procedural Issues
- The Civil Procedure Code includes numerous procedural steps that can lead to delays.
- Delays are often due to a lack of discipline in conducting trials.
- Procedural changes could significantly reduce case processing time, with estimates suggesting a 60% reduction in processing time if more discipline is enforced.
Stakeholder Engagement
- Stakeholder engagement is crucial for successful judicial reform.
- Judges, attorneys, and the public must all be involved in the reform process.
- The World Bank has been engaged to support reform efforts, and the Ministry of Justice has requested assistance in improving the judiciary's performance.
Main Recommendations
Reform Elements
- Enhanced performance management for courts involved in the reform, including regular data collection, performance standards, and proactive management.
- Procedural changes to the Civil Procedure Code, especially more disciplined pre-trial procedures.
- Practical guidance for judges on commercial cases through updated manuals.
- Improved access to legislation and court decisions, including a searchable database.
- Modest investment in expanding the number of commercial courts and improving infrastructure.
- Development of an automated case management system.
- Changes in human resource management, such as the introduction of judicial assistants.
- Targeted training for judges on commercial transactions, business practices, and legal specifics.
Data and Transparency
- More comprehensive and timely data is needed to monitor performance, set targets, and improve public confidence.
- Transparency and public communication are essential to signal the judiciary's commitment to reform.
Conclusion
- The Sri Lankan justice sector is a critical component of the country's economic development agenda.
- Despite the CCHC's efficiency, District Courts remain a major bottleneck.
- Systemic reforms are necessary to improve the judiciary's performance and reduce delays in commercial case adjudication.
- Stakeholder collaboration and leadership from the judiciary are essential for the success of any reform initiative.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载