2002年-世界发展银行全球_Urban_Services_Delivery_and_the_Poor___The_Case_of_Three_Central_American_Cities_Volume_2_City_Reports_132页_6mb
报告摘要
Summary of Urban Services Delivery and the Poor: The Case of Three Central American Cities (Volume II: City Reports)
Core Content
This report provides an in-depth analysis of urban services delivery and its impact on the poor in three Central American cities: San Salvador (El Salvador), Tegucigalpa (Honduras), and Panama City and San Miguelito (Panama). It focuses on the accessibility, quality, and reliability of essential urban services such as land and housing, water and sanitation, electricity, solid waste collection, drainage, and public transport. The study is based on household surveys and data from various institutions and organizations.
Key Cities and Their Context
San Salvador Metropolitan Area (AMSS)
- Urbanization and Poverty: El Salvador is rapidly urbanizing, with 42% of its population living in urban areas in 1980 and increasing to 46% in 1999. By 2010, it is projected that 50% will be urban.
- Poverty Concentration: The AMSS has a high concentration of poverty, with 23% of its population living in poverty in 1998, equivalent to 15% of the national poor.
- Household Characteristics:
- Poor households tend to be larger and grow more rapidly than wealthy ones.
- The majority of poor households are formed outside of AMSS (21%) and move due to financial constraints or availability of land.
- 6% of poor households have firm intentions to move, compared to 9% of wealthy ones.
- Education and Occupation:
- Poor households have significantly lower education levels; 75% of household heads in the lowest quintile have no or incomplete primary education.
- A large percentage of poor households have household heads who are self-employed (37%), work part-time (21%), or do nothing (4%).
- Wealthier households are more likely to work full-time (88%), be affiliated with social security (77%), and have secondary jobs (13%).
- Neighborhood Issues:
- Violence is the most significant problem in all quintiles (37%), followed by water provision (14%) and solid waste collection (11%).
- Poor communities are more self-contained and often rely on informal networks and community organizations for support.
Tegucigalpa
- Urbanization and Poverty:
- Tegucigalpa, as the capital of Honduras, has experienced similar urbanization trends as El Salvador.
- Urban poverty increased from 40% in 1992 to 46% in 1998, with the majority of the poor living in urban areas.
- Household and Neighborhood Characteristics:
- Poor households are more likely to have household heads with no formal education or working in informal sectors.
- Migration to Tegucigalpa is driven by economic opportunities, particularly in the informal sector.
- The city faces challenges in housing and land registration, with a precarious cadastre system.
- Basic Services:
- Water and sanitation coverage is limited, especially for poorer communities.
- Electricity and solid waste collection services are also unevenly distributed.
- Public Transport:
- Public transport is underdeveloped, with high crowding and limited service reliability.
- Poorer households use public transport more frequently, but face longer travel times and higher costs.
Panama City and San Miguelito
- Urbanization and Poverty:
- Panama has a growing urban population, with the urban share increasing from 42% in 1980 to 46% in 1999.
- The report includes data from the Living Standards Survey (ENV) and focuses on land, housing, basic services, and transport.
- Land and Housing:
- The city has a complex institutional framework for land and housing, including the National Water Company (SANAA) and the Housing Ministry (MIVI).
- Housing finance and provision are less developed in poorer areas.
- Basic Services:
- Water and sanitation services are unevenly provided, with significant issues in service quality and coverage.
- Public Transport:
- Public transport is also underdeveloped, with similar challenges to Tegucigalpa.
Main Findings
- Service Quality Over Access: In urban areas, service quality is a more critical issue than access. Poor households often have high service coverage but low quality and reliability.
- Institutional Challenges: All three cities face institutional shortcomings in service delivery, including inadequate infrastructure, weak regulatory frameworks, and limited financial mechanisms for housing and services.
- Poverty Dynamics: Urban poverty is increasing in El Salvador and Honduras, driven by economic shifts, migration, and natural disasters. In Panama, the urban poor are also growing, but data is more limited.
- Community Participation: Poor communities tend to have higher levels of community-based organization and participation, particularly in informal groups and religious institutions.
- Gender and Education: Education levels are strongly correlated with poverty status. Poorer households are more likely to be headed by women and have lower educational attainment, affecting their access to formal employment and services.
- Transport Issues: Public transport is underdeveloped, with high crowding, low service frequency, and poor reliability, particularly affecting lower-income groups.
Key Information
- Funding and Support: The study was supported by the World Bank, the Cities Alliance Program, the Water and Sanitation Program, and the Land and Real Estate Thematic Group.
- Survey Methodology: The study used household surveys and geographic data to assess service delivery across different quintiles of consumption.
- Data Sources: Information was gathered from various national and local institutions, including the National Water Company (ANDA, SANAA, IDAAN), the Electricity Company (CAEES, ENEE), and the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF).
- Policy Implications: The report highlights the need for improved service quality, better housing finance mechanisms, and more inclusive urban planning that considers the needs of the poor.
Conclusion
The report underscores the critical challenges in urban service delivery for the poor in Central American cities. While access to services may be relatively high, the quality, reliability, and affordability remain major issues. Institutional reforms, improved financial mechanisms, and community-based approaches are essential to address these disparities and enhance the living standards of the urban poor.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载