2010年-世界发展银行全球_Secondary_School_Madrasas_in_Bangladesh___Incidence_Quality_and_Implications_for_Reform_86页_1mb
报告摘要
Summary of "Secondary School Madrasas in Bangladesh: Incidence, Quality, and Implications for Reform"
Core Content
This report, part of the Bangladesh Development Series, examines the incidence and quality of secondary school madrasas in Bangladesh, with a focus on how they compare to secular schools and their implications for educational reform.
Main Findings
Incidence of Madrasas
- Quomi madrasas (traditional, unregistered) have a very small share in both primary and secondary education:
- Primary education: Quomi madrasas account for 1.9% of total primary enrolment.
- Secondary education: Quomi madrasas account for 2.2% of total secondary enrolment.
- Aliyah madrasas (registered, state-aided) have a more significant share:
- Primary education: Aliyah madrasas account for 8.4% of total primary enrolment.
- Secondary education: Aliyah madrasas account for 19% of total secondary enrolment.
- Total madrasa enrolment in primary education is 13.8%, including both Aliyah and Quomi madrasas.
- NGO schools account for 8.2% of primary enrolment, which is higher than Quomi madrasas.
Quality of Learning
- Learning outcomes are generally poor across all types of educational institutions in Bangladesh, especially in mathematics and English.
- Math test results:
- Only 35% of students correctly answered the questions.
- School students performed better than Aliyah students.
- Quomi madrasas were excluded from the analysis due to their distinct pedagogic structure.
- English test results:
- Only 33% of students correctly answered the questions.
- Aliyah students are significantly under-represented in the top decile of English performance.
- Religious knowledge:
- Students from madrasas perform well in Islamic studies, with an average of 75% correct answers.
- There is a gender gap in learning outcomes, with girls scoring lower than boys in math and other subjects.
- The learning gap is more pronounced in Aliyah madrasas than in secular schools.
Institutional Differences
- There is a significant variation in test scores within institutions, which is greater than the difference between institution types.
- The institution effect is strong, but it cannot be fully explained by conventional indicators of quality such as curriculum, teacher characteristics, and resources.
- Aliyah madrasas have a more modern curriculum and are coeducational, while Quomi madrasas are traditional, unregistered, and predominantly male.
Key Issues and Implications for Reform
- Poverty and madrasa enrollment: There is a modest link between madrasa education and poverty, but income is not the sole factor.
- Quality of education: Despite the growth in madrasa enrollment, especially among girls, the overall quality of education in both madrasas and secular schools remains low.
- Need for reform: The report recommends that the government should:
- Distinguish between Aliyah and Quomi madrasas in policy discussions.
- Improve the quality of education in madrasas, especially in math and English.
- Ensure that madrasas do not inadvertently increase gender inequality in learning outcomes.
- Reform Quomi madrasas, which are structurally different and often informally organized.
- Anchor policy debates in empirical learning outcomes data rather than anecdotal evidence.
Methodology
- The report is based on the QSSMEB survey, a comprehensive survey of secondary schools and madrasas in rural Bangladesh.
- It integrates household survey data and institutional census data to provide a detailed analysis of the education sector.
- Cognitive tests were administered to 8th-grade students to assess learning outcomes.
- The survey includes data on mathematics, English, general knowledge, and Islamic studies.
Conclusion
- The madrasa sector in Bangladesh is unique in its coexistence with secular schools and its progress in gender parity.
- However, the overall quality of education remains low, and girls are systematically disadvantaged in learning outcomes.
- The report calls for a more nuanced approach to madrasa reform, emphasizing the need for improving basic literacy and numeracy skills across all institutions.
- The findings suggest that madrasas should not be excluded from reform efforts, especially as they play a role in educating the rural poor and addressing gender disparities.
Recommendations
- Develop a national learning assessment system to measure and compare educational quality across institutions.
- Use learning outcomes as a basis for policy discussions and reforms.
- Ensure that public resources are used effectively to improve numeracy and literacy in both secular and religious schools.
- Engage with Quomi madrasas to improve their curriculum and pedagogic structure.
- Promote gender equality in learning outcomes, not just in access to education.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载