EBA欧洲银行-EBA-MB-2012-012EBA-MB-20-February-Telco-Minutes-_2页_181kb

EBA Management Board Meeting Summary

Date and Time

• Date: 20 February 2012
• Time: 10:00hrs – 10:45hrs
• Location: London

Participants

Present:

• Andrea Enria – Chairperson
• Mary Burke (for Matthew Elderfield – Alternate Chairperson)
• Daniele Nouy – member Management Board
• Karoly Szasz – member Management Board
• Uldis Cerps (for Martin Andersson – member Management Board)
• Peter Lutz (for Raimund Roeseler – member Management Board)
• David Rozumek – member Management Board
• Mario Nava – EU Commission representative
• Adam Farkas – Executive Director
• Piers Haben – Director Oversight

Apologies:

• Jukka Vesala – member Management Board

Core Content

The meeting was a brief conference call convened by the Chairperson, Andrea Enria, to discuss two specific follow-up actions related to previous EBA recommendations:

1. Follow-up to the July 2011 EBA Stress Test Recommendation

   • The purpose of the meeting was to seek the Management Board's (MB) opinion on the follow-up to this recommendation.
   • The MB was asked to consider whether the European Banking Authority (EBA) should seek the opinion of the Board of Supervisors (BoS) on the matter.

2. Follow-up to the December 2011 EBA Recapitalisation Recommendation

   • Similarly, the MB was consulted on whether the EBA should seek the BoS's opinion on the follow-up to this recommendation.

Main Points and Decisions

• The Chairperson emphasized the importance of consulting the BoS on these two follow-up issues.
• The Management Board members collectively agreed that both issues should be referred to the Board of Supervisors for further consideration and decision-making.
• The meeting concluded with a decision to adjourn the session, indicating that no further action was required at that time.

Key Information

• Purpose of the meeting: To obtain the MB's opinion on follow-up actions to two prior EBA recommendations.
• Recommended actions: Seeking the opinion of the Board of Supervisors on the follow-up to the July and December 2011 recommendations.
• Outcome: The MB supported the referral of these issues to the BoS for decision-making.
• Participants: All MB members were present, with some representing others due to absence. The EU Commission representative and key directors were also present.
• Duration: The meeting lasted only 45 minutes, highlighting its focused and procedural nature.

Conclusion

This meeting was a short and procedural session aimed at ensuring that the Management Board provided its input on the follow-up to two important EBA recommendations. The consensus reached was to forward these matters to the Board of Supervisors for further deliberation and decision. The absence of Jukka Vesala was noted, but the meeting proceeded without any significant delays or complications.