EBA欧洲银行-EBA-BS-2012-272-Annex-1-publicAnnex-implementation-study-AMA-extensions-and-changes-_3页_159kb
报告摘要
会员国关于AMA变更实施情况的总结
核心内容概述
本总结基于各会员国对《巴塞尔III》中关于**资产抵押品(Asset-Backed Collateral, AMA)**变更的实施情况,包括是否实施、是否修改定义、变更审查频率、通知形式以及阈值调整等关键信息。
各会员国实施情况
| 会员国 | 实施情况 | 定义修改 | 变更审查频率 | 通知形式 | 阈值调整 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT | Yes | No | Regular intervals (case by case) | In writing | No |
| BE | In part | Application files can be introduced twice a year | Permanent internal file within institution, accessible by NBB | In writing (application file for significant changes) | No |
| BG | Yes | No | In due time | By signed letter (electronically or on paper) | No |
| CY | Yes | No | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CZ | Yes | No | In compliance with group AMA Change Policy (ACP) and procedures | In compliance with group AMA Change Policy (ACP) and procedures | No |
| DE | Yes | No | Annually collected, latest one year after last report | Written form | Threshold for major changes are more than 10% and less than 20%. Changes of more than 20% are classified as significant. |
| DK | Yes | No | N/A | Written procedure | No |
| EE | Yes | No | Yearly | In writing | No |
| EL | Yes | No | Annual basis | In writing | No |
| ES | Yes | Definition of the application period for significant changes and extensions set as three months | Once a year | By letter | No, subject to internal procedures |
| FI | No (expected end 2012) | No | Within a reasonable timeframe | Written document | No |
| FR | Yes | No | Annual basis | Official administrative letter | No |
| HU | Yes | No | Once a year | In writing and electronically | No |
| IE | Yes | No | Yearly | Formal notification | No |
| IS | No | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IT | Yes | No | Yearly | In written format | No |
| LI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| LT | Yes | No | Yearly | By post or email | No |
| LU | Yes | No | Same as guidelines | Same as guidelines | No |
| LV | Yes | No | Annual basis | Electronic or paper documents | No |
| MT | Yes | No | N/A | N/A | No |
| NL | Yes | No | At least annually | In writing | No |
| NO | Yes | No | N/A | N/A | No |
| PL | No | No | Annually | Hardcopy form | No |
| PT | Yes | Direct reference to GL45 through Instruction of Banco de Portugal | No additional guidance provided | Standard procedure | No |
| RO | Yes | No | Annually | Standard procedure | No |
| SE | No | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SI | Yes | No | Promptly if subsidiary is affected | By letter | N/A |
| SK | Yes | Included in Decree of Národná banka Slovenska (26 April 2011) | Immediately | As defined | No |
| UK | In part | Yes | Quarterly in arrears | Quarterly letter; formal application for extensions and changes | Threshold set at >1% (major) >10% (significant) |
主要观点
- 大部分国家已实施:除了少数国家如FI、IS、SE,大部分会员国已按照《巴塞尔III》的《通用指引》(GL 45)及即将发布的《实施条例》(RTS)实施AMA变更管理。
- 部分国家实施不完全:如UK仅部分实施,其参考GL45但未完全纳入,且需遵循FSA的内部流程。
- 定义修改较少:多数国家未对AMA定义进行修改,仅UK和SK在定义上有所调整。
- 审查频率多样:多数国家按年度审查,部分国家如DE、ES按特定时间间隔(如季度、半年)进行审查,而一些国家如SI、SK则在需要时立即审查。
- 通知形式统一:大部分国家要求以书面形式通知,少数国家如BE、UK允许通过应用文件或正式信函进行通知。
- 阈值调整存在差异:只有DE和UK明确了AMA变更的阈值,其他多数国家未进行调整,或未提供具体信息。
关键信息
- 实施时间:多数国家在2012年已开始实施,如DE、ES、HU、PT等。
- 审查机制:各国根据自身情况设定审查频率,如年度、季度或半年一次。
- 通知流程:通知通常为书面形式,部分国家允许电子提交。
- 阈值设定:DE和UK设定了具体的阈值(>10%或>1%),其他国家未提及具体数值。
- 例外情况:部分国家如BE、PT、SK等通过内部文件或指导文件实施,未明确提及是否需向监管机构提交变更申请。
总结
总体来看,大多数会员国已按照《巴塞尔III》要求实施了AMA变更管理,部分国家通过内部政策或直接引用GL45进行调整。审查频率和通知形式较为统一,但阈值设定和变更定义的调整情况存在差异。UK是唯一明确设定AMA变更阈值的国家,而DE、ES等国家也提供了相关细节。整体趋势显示,各国在遵循国际标准的同时,也在根据自身监管环境进行适当的本地化调整。
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载