2009-04-28-皮尤-Public_Sees_Too_Much_Personal_Coverage_of_Obama_13页_67kb

Report Focus: This document summarizes the results of the Pew Research Center's News Interest Index survey from April 2009, assessing public perceptions of media coverage during Barack Obama's early presidency.

Key Findings on Coverage Amounts:

• Personal Life: A majority (53%) felt too much coverage focused on Obama's family and personal life, while 40% viewed it as appropriate.
• Leadership and Job Management: About 60% considered the coverage of his leadership style and job performance satisfactory.
• Policy Proposals: More than half (58%) thought coverage was adequate for policy proposals, but only around 50% of Republicans and 52% of Independents agreed; Democrats were more supportive.

Partisan Differences: Notable divides emerged, with Democrats viewing coverage as fair overall (55% agree), while Republicans were more critical and concerned about insufficient coverage on policies and leadership (with 51% deeming it not critical enough).

Dominant Newsmaker: Obama was the most recognized figure, cited by 81% of respondents as the most followed news item.

High Interest Areas: Swine flu outbreaks drew significant attention from 25% closely tracking reports; auto industry issues were followed by 30%; other topics included CIA interrogations and Iraq.

Overall Perception: Publicly, coverage was seen as fair, though partisanship influenced views; for instance, partisan distinctions shaped opinions on Obama stories, with Republicans more likely to believe certain coverage was excessive or lacking.