2018年-查塔姆研究所_Transitional_Justice_and_the_Arab_Spring_16页_276kb
报告摘要
Meeting Summary: International Law and Middle East Programme
Transitional Justice and the Arab Spring
Rapporteur: Hemi Mistry
Date: 1 February 2012
This document discusses the role of transitional justice mechanisms in the context of the Arab Spring, focusing on how these mechanisms can help societies emerging from authoritarian rule to address past human rights violations and build a reconciled future. The meeting involved participants from NGOs, embassies, academics, and practising lawyers, and was held under the Chatham House Rule.
Core Content
Transitional justice encompasses a range of judicial and non-judicial mechanisms aimed at addressing past wrongs, particularly those committed by former regimes. These mechanisms are crucial for societal reconciliation, ensuring accountability, seeking truth, and restoring public trust in state institutions.
Key objectives of transitional justice include:
- Accountability: Ensuring that those responsible for past wrongs are held to account.
- Truth-seeking: Establishing a historical record of events and harms.
- Institutional reform: Reforming state institutions, particularly the security services and judiciary, to align with the rule of law.
Key Mechanisms
Judicial Mechanisms
- National Courts: Civil or criminal courts that can prosecute violations of national law. However, in many post-authoritarian societies, these courts may lack independence or capacity.
- International Criminal Court (ICC): Has jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. However, most Middle Eastern countries have not ratified the Rome Statute, limiting its applicability.
- Internationalized Tribunals: Such as the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL), established through agreement with the UN and the country concerned, rather than the Security Council.
Non-judicial Mechanisms
- Truth Commissions: Investigative bodies that help establish a historical record and provide a platform for victims to share their experiences.
- Lustration: A process of vetting and removing individuals from the old regime or those responsible for crimes, as seen in Iraq's 'de-Ba'athification'.
Fundamental Principles
- Consultation: Transitional justice policies must be developed in consultation with the affected society. This ensures that the mechanisms align with local needs and values, while still respecting international standards.
- Tailored Approach: A 'cookie-cutter' approach is rejected. Each society has unique circumstances that require a tailored strategy.
Case Studies
Lebanon
- The STL was established to investigate the assassination of former Prime Minister Hariri.
- Despite its political utility, the Tribunal has faced criticism and skepticism, especially as it lacks the ability to address broader economic crimes.
- The process is irreversible once initiated, even if internal actors lose interest.
Tunisia
- Considered a 'classic' transitional justice case with political will to address past wrongs.
- Initial trials were limited and lacked a coherent prosecutorial strategy.
- There is ongoing consultation and debate on how to comprehensively examine the Ben Ali regime, including its economic crimes.
Morocco
- Initiated transitional justice mechanisms before the Arab Spring.
- However, the lack of regime change raises questions about the authenticity and impact of these measures.
- Human rights abuses continue under the current monarchy, undermining the credibility of the process.
Libya
- Transitional justice mechanisms were implemented without adequate consultation.
- The NTC's desire to try Gaddafi domestically clashed with ICC obligations.
- The ICC referral was seen as part of the 'responsibility to protect' rather than a traditional transitional justice measure.
Egypt
- The transition is incomplete, with the military still holding significant power.
- Trials of Mubarak lack credibility and fail to address broader systemic issues.
- Economic crimes and the role of the military in the economy are important areas for future transitional justice efforts.
Bahrain
- The King appointed an independent commission to investigate 2011 violence, but it failed to identify perpetrators or attribute responsibility.
- The process lacks the necessary political will and independence.
Yemen
- The transitional justice mechanisms are not based on consultation and appear to follow a checklist approach.
- The immunity deal for President Saleh reflects a reactive rather than a proactive approach to justice.
Thematic Issues
Economic Crimes
- Economic crimes are often intertwined with human rights violations in Arab Spring countries.
- Examples include the use of corrupt funds to support oppressive security forces.
- The recovery and distribution of assets from former regimes pose complex legal and political challenges, requiring international cooperation.
Timing
- There is a need to balance the timing of transitional justice measures between emotional reactions and the practical needs of the process.
- Timely investigations are essential to preserve evidence and prevent the accused from benefiting from their actions.
- Delayed justice can undermine the rule of law and lead to revenge-seeking.
Sequencing
- The order in which transitional justice mechanisms are implemented matters.
- In cases of mass criminality, a holistic approach focusing on truth-seeking may be more effective than immediate trials.
- Decisions on individual vs. collective responsibility must be made on a case-by-case basis.
Main Viewpoints
- Transitional justice is essential for societal reconciliation and rebuilding trust in state institutions.
- International mechanisms, such as the ICC and STL, play a role but are not universally applicable or welcomed.
- The Arab Spring has highlighted the need for a more nuanced and context-specific approach to transitional justice.
- Consultation with local actors is vital to ensure legitimacy and effectiveness.
- Economic crimes are a critical but often overlooked component of transitional justice in the region.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载