2004年-世界发展银行全球_Philippines_-_Education_Policy_Reforms_in_Action___A_Review_of_Progress_Since_PESS_and_PCER_29页_205kb

报告摘要

Philippines Education Policy Reforms in Action: A Review of Progress Since PESS and PCER

Core Content

This report evaluates the progress made in implementing education policy reforms in the Philippines since the Philippine Education Sector Study (PESS) and the Presidential Commission on Education Reform (PCER). It outlines the key policy priorities, the actions taken, and the challenges that remain in improving the education system across basic, higher, and technical-vocational education (TVET) sectors.

Main Objectives

To assess the progress in implementing key policy reforms.
To identify the main challenges and constraints.
To evaluate the effectiveness of reforms and their impact on education outcomes.
To provide insights into the future directions and priorities for the education sector.

Key Recommendations and Actions

Basic Education

Setting

The Philippines has achieved near-universal enrollment in Grade 1.
However, dropout and repetition rates remain high, and achievement levels in basic education are considered unsatisfactory.
Enrollment rates in secondary education have increased, but completion rates are still low, with less than 50% of students who started Grade 1 completing high school.

PESS/PCER Recommendations

Address textbook shortages by improving the efficiency of acquisition, provision, and use.
Target new investments to disadvantaged areas.
Improve teacher effectiveness.
Encourage multigrade instruction through compensation supplements.
Carefully manage public investments and education service contracting to use private sector capacity.
Improve organizational communication in basic education.
Introduce curriculum and medium of instruction changes to support learning.

Actions Taken

A regional lingua franca or vernacular-based instruction policy was piloted in 1999 and later implemented more widely.
The Restructured Basic Education Curriculum (RBEC) was launched in 2002, reducing the number of subjects and increasing contact hours in core subjects.
The Multigrade Program was expanded to cover 130 schools with the most disadvantaged students, supported by UNICEF and UNDP.
There are plans to expand the Multigrade Program to more schools and students.

Assessment

Progress has been made in textbook provision and curriculum restructuring.
However, real per-capita government spending on basic education continues to decline due to population growth and inflation.
Teacher productivity and systemic management effectiveness have not improved significantly.
Equitable access and accountability mechanisms remain underdeveloped.

Higher Education

Setting

There is an uneven distribution of higher education institutions (HEIs) across the country.
The reliance on tuition fees has led to the proliferation of low-quality state colleges and universities (SUCs).
Public funding for higher education has not improved significantly, and self-financing by HEIs is limited.

PESS/PCER Recommendations

Rationalize and mobilize funds for higher education.
Slow and reverse the haphazard expansion of low-quality tertiary institutions.
Improve the quality of higher education through deregulation and support for best institutions.
Ensure equitable access for the poor through targeted scholarships.
Improve the effectiveness of higher education in preparing teachers for basic education.

Actions Taken

CHED has slowed the growth of low-quality SUCs.
The share of tertiary education in total government spending has been contained.
Some deregulation has been introduced for top institutions, allowing them to focus on quality improvement.

Assessment

The creation of new SUCs continues to be a threat due to political interests.
Scholarship targeting has not changed.
Teacher productivity remains a challenge.
Public funding for higher education has not been effectively redirected to improve quality or equity.

Technical-Vocational Education and Training (TVET)

Setting

TVET options are mostly privately provided, but quality varies significantly.
Skills demand patterns are constantly changing, and the system is slow to adapt.

PESS/PCER Recommendations

Reliance on private providers for TVET programs to respond quickly to market needs.
Public financing should be used to induce quality in private TVET offerings.
Education service contracting and development funds for private providers were recommended.

Actions Taken

TESDA has focused on improving quality, efficiency, and equity across all TVET programs.
The Basic Education Assistance for Mindanao (BEAM) and Philippines-Australia Quality Technical Vocational Education and Training (PAQTVET II) have been implemented to support TVET in specific regions and with international cooperation.

Assessment

TESDA has made progress in quality assurance, but full transformation to a monitoring and regulatory role is still pending.
Budget constraints continue to be a major obstacle to reform implementation.

Major Challenges

Sector-wide accountability, leadership, and planning mechanisms are still lacking.
Teacher productivity and utilization have not improved significantly.
School efficiency and equity in access remain major concerns.
Public spending on scholarships has not been effectively focused.
Strategic implementation of reforms has been hindered by a lack of clear guidance and prioritization.

Strategic Implementation and Institutional Environment

The PESS and PCER recommendations have not been fully implemented due to political resistance, lack of clear implementation scenarios, and budget constraints.
Decentralization has not been effectively applied to the education sector, despite the potential benefits.
Information collection is inefficient and sporadic, limiting the ability to make informed decisions.

Political Will

There is a prevailing illusion that education reforms are discretionary rather than a vital necessity.
A shared sense of urgency for reform is still lacking, which affects the sustainability and impact of reforms.

Conclusion

While some progress has been made in education policy reforms in the Philippines, many critical changes are still pending. The focus has been on improving curriculum, textbook provision, and private sector participation, but systemic issues such as funding, teacher development, and accountability continue to hinder overall effectiveness. The need for stronger political will, strategic implementation, and institutional reforms remains urgent to ensure equitable access, quality education, and sustainable development in the education sector.

展开完整摘要

试读结束，高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载