EBA欧洲银行-QAs_13页_190kb

2010 EU-wide Stress Testing Exercise Summary

Core Content

The 2010 EU-wide stress testing exercise was a comprehensive assessment of the resilience of the EU banking sector to adverse economic and sovereign risk scenarios. It aimed to provide policy information for evaluating the financial stability of banks and the broader banking system, using a set of hypothetical "what if" scenarios to simulate severe economic shocks.

Main Objectives

• Purpose: To evaluate the ability of EU banks to absorb potential losses under adverse conditions, particularly focusing on credit and market risks, including sovereign debt exposure.
• Scope: Covering at least 50% of the total assets of each EU Member State, with 91 banks participating in the exercise, representing 65% of the EU banking sector's total assets.
• Time Horizon: The test was based on 2009 year-end figures and applied over a two-year period (2010–2011), aligning with standard practices.

Key Methodology

• Scenarios: Two main scenarios were considered:
  • A benchmark scenario for 2010 and 2011.
  • An adverse scenario with more severe assumptions, including a 3 percentage point deviation in GDP growth over the two-year period.
• Sovereign Risk Shock: Modeled after the Greek crisis, it involved increased bond yields and valuation haircuts on sovereign debt in the trading book. No assumption of sovereign default was made.
• Capital Ratio Threshold: A Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% was used as a benchmark for determining the need for recapitalisation, though this is not a regulatory minimum. The regulatory minimum is 4%, as set by the Capital Requirement Directive (CRD).

Risk and Exposure Considerations

• Risks Tested: Credit and market risks were the primary focus. Liquidity risks were not directly assessed.
• Exposure Types: Included banking and trading books, with specific attention to:
  • Available-for-sale equity exposures in the banking book.
  • Sovereign exposures in the trading book.
  • Securitisation exposures.
• Sovereign Risk Stress: Applied valuation haircuts to sovereign debt in the trading book and adjusted PDs (Probability of Default) and LGDs (Loss Given Default) for non-sovereign exposures in the banking book, reflecting the macroeconomic impact.

Outcomes and Implications

• Aggregate Results: The EU banking sector's Tier 1 capital ratio under the adverse scenario would drop from 10.3% in 2009 to 9.2% by the end of 2011.
• Losses: Total impairment and trading losses under the adverse scenario and sovereign shock would amount to 566 billion euros over the two-year period.
• Banks That Failed: 7 banks did not meet the 6% Tier 1 capital ratio threshold under the adverse scenario. These banks were advised to develop plans to address weaknesses, potentially including capital increases.

Differences from 2009 Exercise

• Scope Expansion: 2010 test included 91 banks compared to 26 in 2009.
• Detailed Reporting: A comprehensive report was published, including individual bank results and sovereign exposure breakdowns.
• Focus on Sovereign Risk: The 2010 test included a sovereign risk shock, which was not part of the 2009 exercise.

Comparison with US Stress Testing

• Similarities: Both exercises used a two-year time horizon, focused on credit risk, and disclosed individual bank results.
• Differences:
  • Objective: The EU test aimed to assess the sector's resilience, while the US test focused on individual bank capital needs.
  • Complexity: The EU test involved more banks and supervisory authorities across 27 jurisdictions.
  • Timing: The EU test occurred after major government interventions, unlike the US test which was conducted during a government intervention.

State Aid and Backstop Arrangements

• State Support and Aid Rules: Banks receiving public support must comply with EU State aid rules, which are designed to preserve a level playing field in the internal market.
• Approval Process: The European Commission can approve state aid measures rapidly, even overnight. Approval is typically temporary and subject to later reassessment.
• Viability Assessment: The Commission uses criteria such as capital adequacy, recapitalisation size, credit default spread, and bank ratings to determine whether a bank is fundamentally sound or requires restructuring.

Conclusion

The 2010 EU-wide stress testing exercise provided a detailed assessment of the resilience of the EU banking system under severe economic and sovereign risk scenarios. While the aggregate results indicated strong resilience, the exercise highlighted the importance of continued government support and the need for banks to maintain sufficient capital buffers. The results are not forecasts but indicators of potential losses under hypothetical shocks, and they are used by supervisors to guide future actions and ensure the long-term viability of banks.