战略与国际研究中心-US-and-Iranian-Strategic-Competition_-The-Proxy-Cold-War-in-the-Levant,-Egypt-and-Jordan_90页_1mb

U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition in the Levant, Egypt, and Jordan: Summary

Core Content

This document analyzes the strategic competition between the United States and Iran in the Levant, Egypt, and Jordan, focusing on military, economic, and political dimensions. It outlines the U.S. and Iranian interests, the asymmetric military strategies employed by both, and the socio-economic factors influencing their regional engagement. The document also examines the impact of U.S. military aid on key allies and the role of non-state actors such as Hezbollah and Hamas in shaping this competition.

U.S. Interests in the Region

• The U.S. seeks to maintain energy security and stabilize regional infrastructure, particularly through the Arab Gas Pipeline and the Suez Canal.
• It prioritizes supporting Israel, its key ally in the Middle East, through military aid and arms transfers, which have helped Israel maintain a qualitative military edge (QME) over its Arab neighbors.
• The Arab-Israeli peace process is a core U.S. strategic interest, aimed at reducing regional instability and improving Muslim and Arab perceptions of the U.S..
• The U.S. aims to counter non-state armed groups like Hezbollah and Hamas, which are seen as threats to regional stability and U.S. interests.
• Military aid to Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon is used to strengthen alliances, support regional stability, and discourage arms proliferation.

Iranian Interests in the Region

• Iran seeks to expand its regional influence through proxy and asymmetric warfare, particularly by supporting Syria, Hezbollah, and Hamas.
• It views Arab-Israeli conflict as an opportunity to challenge U.S. hegemony and advance its own geopolitical goals.
• Iran's support for Syria and Lebanese Shi'a communities has helped it build a "Resistance Axis" to counter U.S. and Israeli interests.
• It aims to undermine U.S. regional influence and promote its own narrative of resistance and Palestinian solidarity.

Military Dimensions of the Competition

Conventional Military Balance

• The U.S. maintains a strong conventional military presence in the region through alliances with Israel, Egypt, and Jordan.
• Iran has limited conventional capabilities due to Western sanctions and the collapse of its pro-Western regime, but has developed missile and nuclear capabilities.

Asymmetric Warfare

• Iran has built a powerful asymmetric force in the Gulf, including missile technology and proxy groups.
• Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine are key Iranian proxies that challenge U.S. and Israeli interests.
• The U.S. has countered these threats through military aid and support for moderate Arab states and security forces.

Socio-Economic Levers of Influence

• U.S. economic support includes foreign military financing (FMF) and development assistance, which are used to secure alliances and promote stability.
• Iran leverages energy resources and OPEC membership to gain regional leverage.
• U.S. aid to Egypt, Jordan, and Israel has been critical in maintaining peace agreements and military modernization.
• Lebanon receives limited U.S. aid, but has seen increased support following Syria's withdrawal in 2005.
• Security aid to the Palestinian Authority (PA) is aimed at strengthening security forces and promoting rule of law, though challenges persist in terms of local legitimacy and security coordination.

Key Areas of Competition

Syria

• U.S. policy focuses on denying Iranian influence and promoting stability.
• Iran's response includes supporting the Assad regime and Hezbollah.
• The outcome of Syria's political instability could shift the balance of power in the region.

Lebanon

• U.S. support is aimed at countering Hezbollah and promoting regional stability.
• Iran's support for Hezbollah has been critical to its influence in Lebanon.
• The Special Tribunal for Lebanon is a key U.S. initiative to address past conflicts.

Israel

• The U.S.-Israel military partnership is a core component of U.S. strategy to counter Iran.
• Iran views Israel as a direct threat, particularly due to its nuclear ambitions.
• The U.S. continues to support Israel's security and peace process efforts.

West Bank and Gaza Strip

• U.S. interests include supporting the Palestinian Authority and fostering reconciliation between Fatah and Hamas.
• Iran sees Palestine as a strategic asset to challenge U.S. influence.

Egypt and Jordan

• U.S. policy in Egypt includes military and economic aid, which has helped maintain stability.
• Jordan has received significant U.S. support, particularly for military modernization and peace with Israel.
• Iran has limited influence in these countries, though it seeks to exploit instability.

Persistent and Emerging Challenges

• Instability in the Middle East remains a major challenge for both the U.S. and Iran.
• The "Blue Line" (Lebanon-Israel border) remains highly volatile, with Hezbollah being a major threat.
• Energy security and regional infrastructure are key U.S. concerns.
• Arab resentment towards Iran's influence and regional hegemony could impact future dynamics.

Implications for U.S. Policy

• The U.S. must continue its military and economic support to maintain regional stability and counter Iranian influence.
• The Arab-Israeli conflict remains a core issue in the U.S.-Iran competition.
• Non-state actors like Hezbollah and Hamas will continue to play a significant role in regional security and strategic competition.
• The U.S. is increasingly concerned about Iran's nuclear and missile programs, as well as its proxy warfare in the Levant.

Conclusion

The U.S. and Iran's strategic competition in the Levant, Egypt, and Jordan is a proxy cold war that has evolved over decades. The U.S. focuses on stability, energy security, and counter-terrorism, while Iran uses proxy forces and asymmetric warfare to challenge U.S. influence. The outcome of this competition is uncertain, influenced by regional instability, political shifts, and military dynamics.