EBA欧洲银行-IT_815600D79C96B9661149_16页_3mb
报告摘要
2014 EU-wide Stress Test Summary for IT - Iccrea Holding S.p.A
Core Information
- Bank Name: IT - Iccrea Holding S.p.A
- LEI Code: 815600D79C96B9661149
- Test Type: EU-wide Stress Test
- Reporting Date: 31 December 2016
- Reported Metrics: Operating profit, impairment losses, CET1 capital, Total Risk Exposure, CET1 ratio
Summary of Actual Figures (as of 31 December 2013)
| Metric | Value (min EUR) | % |
|---|---|---|
| Operating profit before impairments | 292 | - |
| Impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book | 297 | - |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital (CET1) | 1,437 | - |
| Total Risk Exposure | 13,480 | - |
| Common Equity Tier 1 ratio | 10.7% | - |
Summary of Adverse Scenario Outcomes (as of 31 December 2016)
| Metric | Value (min EUR) | % |
|---|---|---|
| 3 yr cumulative operating profit before impairments | 671 | - |
| 3 yr cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book | 1,271 | - |
| 3 yr cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book | 20 | - |
| Valuation losses due to sovereign shock after tax and prudential filters | 12 | - |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital (CET1) | 1,013 | - |
| Total Risk Exposure | 13,764 | - |
| Common Equity Tier 1 ratio | 7.4% | - |
CET1 Threshold (Adverse Scenario): 5.5% (value: 757 min EUR)
Summary of Baseline Scenario Outcomes (as of 31 December 2016)
| Metric | Value (min EUR) | % |
|---|---|---|
| 3 yr cumulative operating profit before impairments | 556 | - |
| 3 yr cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book | 423 | - |
| 3 yr cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book | 10 | - |
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital (CET1) | 1,530 | - |
| Total Risk Exposure | 13,648 | - |
| Common Equity Tier 1 ratio | 11.2% | - |
CET1 Threshold (Baseline Scenario): 8.0% (value: 1,092 min EUR)
Key Findings
-
CET1 Ratio Trends:
- As of 31 December 2013, the CET1 ratio was 10.7%.
- In the Baseline Scenario as of 31 December 2016, the CET1 ratio improved to 11.2%.
- In the Adverse Scenario as of 31 December 2016, the CET1 ratio decreased to 7.4%, below the 5.5% threshold.
-
Operating Profit:
- In the Baseline Scenario, cumulative operating profit over 3 years increased from 292 to 556 min EUR.
- In the Adverse Scenario, cumulative operating profit over 3 years increased from 292 to 671 min EUR.
-
Impairment Losses:
- In the Baseline Scenario, cumulative impairment losses over 3 years increased from 297 to 423 min EUR.
- In the Adverse Scenario, cumulative impairment losses over 3 years increased from 297 to 1,271 min EUR.
-
Trading Book Losses:
- The Baseline Scenario reported a cumulative trading book loss of 10 min EUR.
- The Adverse Scenario reported a cumulative trading book loss of 20 min EUR.
-
Valuation Losses:
- The Adverse Scenario included valuation losses due to sovereign shock of 12 min EUR after tax and prudential filters.
-
Capital and Risk Exposure:
- CET1 capital decreased from 1,437 to 1,013 min EUR in the Adverse Scenario.
- Total Risk Exposure increased slightly from 13,480 to 13,764 min EUR in the Adverse Scenario.
-
Mandatory Conversions:
- No instruments with mandatory conversion into ordinary shares were reported in the 2014-2016 period.
- No Additional Tier 1 or Tier 2 instruments were eligible for conversion into CET1 or written down in the adverse scenario.
Risk Exposure by Sector (as of 31 December 2013)
| Sector | Exposure (F-IRB) | Exposure (A-IRB) | Exposure (STA) | Risk Exposure (F-IRB) | Risk Exposure (A-IRB) | Risk Exposure (STA) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (F-IRB) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (A-IRB) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (STA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31,396 | 0 | 0 | 781 | 0 | 0 |
| Institutions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,340 | 136 | 0 | 1,806 | 146 | 0 |
| Corporates | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,229 | 691 | 0 | 5,508 | 828 | 0 |
| Corporates - SME | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,439 | 548 | 0 | 3,747 | 652 | 0 |
| Retail | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,376 | 679 | 0 | 1,925 | 765 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 79.2% | 0 | 0 | 1,198 | 124 | 0 | 534 | 133 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - SME | 81.7% | 0 | 0 | 1,033 | 115 | 0 | 470 | 125 | 0 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - non-SME | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 165 | 9 | 0 | 65 | 9 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,178 | 555 | 0 | 1,390 | 632 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - SME | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,382 | 482 | 0 | 793 | 543 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - non-SME | 0 | 0 | 0 | 796 | 73 | 0 | 597 | 88 | 0 |
| Equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 148 | 0 | 0 |
| Securitisation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other non-credit obligation assets | 0 | 0 | 0 | 541 | 0 | 0 | 281 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44,942 | 1,505 | 0 | 10,447 | 1,739 | 0 |
Additional Notes
- Securitisation Deductions: Securitisation and re-securitisation positions were deducted from capital and not included in Risk Weighted Assets (RWA).
- Coverage Ratios: The coverage ratio for default stock in the Baseline Scenario increased over the 3 years, indicating improved capital adequacy.
- Impairment Rates: Impairment rates and stock of provisions varied across different sectors, with some showing significant increases in the adverse scenario.
- LTV Ratios: LTV ratios were reported for certain sectors, such as Retail - Secured on real estate property, which varied between 63.4% and 81.7%.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载