兰德-Oversight-of-emerging-science-and-technology_-Learning-from-past-and-present-efforts-around-the-world_128页_7mb

Oversight of Emerging Science and Technology: A Global Comparative Study

Core Content

This report, commissioned by Wellcome, explores the oversight of emerging science and technology through a qualitative comparative study of ten case vignettes. It aims to identify lessons and guiding principles for effective, efficient, and ethical oversight strategies, with a focus on positioning the UK as a global leader in this area.

Main Objectives

• To examine past and present oversight approaches across different countries, sectors, and time periods.
• To extract common learning from these examples to inform future oversight strategies.
• To support Wellcome’s broader initiative to identify steps for the UK to lead in science and technology oversight.

Key Methods

The study used a mixed-methods approach, which included:

• Case vignette selection:

  • A crowdsourcing exercise with global stakeholders to gather potential examples.
  • Online searches using Google and Google Scholar to find additional relevant cases.
  • A prioritisation exercise with Wellcome to select the final ten case vignettes.

• Desk research:

  • Rapid evidence assessments of academic and grey literature related to each case.

• Stakeholder interviews:

  • Engaging with individuals and organisations connected to the case vignettes to gain deeper insights.

• Workshop analysis:

  • Collaborating with Wellcome to cross-analyse findings and identify common themes and lessons.

Key Case Vignettes

1. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

   • A legally binding international agreement to govern the transboundary movement of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), developed in response to public concerns about environmental and health risks.

2. E-government and digital society in Estonia

   • Estonia's early adoption of e-government and digital society initiatives, supported by strategic policy, legislation, tax incentives, and public education.

3. Fintech regulatory sandboxes in the UK and beyond

   • The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) introduced a regulatory sandbox to allow fintech firms to test innovations with limited regulatory requirements, influencing similar initiatives globally.

4. The Green Revolution: Agricultural technology in India

   • The development and promotion of High Yielding Varieties (HYVs) of crops, supported by public infrastructure and international collaboration, significantly increased agricultural productivity.

5. M-Pesa: Branchless mobile banking in Kenya

   • M-Pesa, a mobile banking service, was supported by the Central Bank of Kenya through regulatory frameworks and collaboration with developers and citizens to ensure safety and accessibility.

6. DAMD: The Danish General Practitioners Database

   • A system developed by Danish GPs and health authorities to capture and store patient data, enhancing healthcare delivery and analysis.

7. The Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM)

   • A pan-European standard for 2G cellular networks, developed through collaboration between the EU, national governments, and private stakeholders.

8. The NIH Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee in the United States

   • Established in 1973 to address the ethical and safety concerns of recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology, it provided a framework for responsible research and development.

9. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act in the UK

   • A legal framework regulating assisted reproductive technologies, creating an independent regulatory body (HFEA) to ensure patient safety and ethical research.

10. The first crypto-war: Public key cryptography in the United States

    • The development of public key cryptography led to a conflict between government agencies seeking to restrict encryption access and a coalition of non-state actors advocating for open access and privacy rights.

Main Lessons and Principles

• Adaptability and initiative: Effective oversight requires the ability to adapt to new technologies while taking timely action.
• Collaboration and public engagement: Involving a wide range of stakeholders, including the public, is essential for building trust and ensuring inclusive decision-making.
• Balancing risks and benefits: Oversight must consider both the potential benefits and risks of emerging technologies to avoid stifling innovation or exposing populations to harm.
• Standardisation and international cooperation: Coordinating across borders and developing common standards can help overcome fragmentation and ensure consistent oversight.
• Legal and regulatory frameworks: Robust legal structures are necessary to govern the development and use of emerging technologies.
• Context-specific application: Oversight strategies must be tailored to the specific context and technology, as no single approach is universally applicable.
• Public confidence and trust: Effective oversight is crucial for building public confidence in new technologies and fostering their adoption.

Key Stakeholders

• Government: Central and regional authorities, regulatory bodies, and policy-making institutions.
• Industry and academia: Private sector entities, research institutions, and innovators.
• Civil society and the public: Advocacy groups, citizens, and non-state actors involved in shaping the ethical and social implications of technology.

Conclusion

The report highlights that oversight is a dynamic and multifaceted process, essential for managing the risks and opportunities of emerging science and technology. The lessons derived from these case studies provide a framework for developing effective, efficient, and ethical oversight systems. These insights are intended to stimulate discussion and inform future policy and decision-making processes related to the governance of emerging technologies.