卡内基国际和平基金会-A-Stitch-in-Time-Helping-Vulnerable-Countries-Meet-the-Challenges-of-Apparel-Quota-Elimination_23页_341kb

Summary of "Policy Outlook: Trade, Equity, and Development" (October 2005)

Core Content

This document analyzes the impact of the elimination of textile and apparel quotas on smaller, less industrialized developing countries, particularly those that have relied heavily on these quotas for their export-oriented apparel industries. It highlights the challenges these countries face in maintaining their competitiveness in a global market without such restraints and argues for a more comprehensive policy response from developed countries.

Main Viewpoints

• Quota Elimination Context: The U.S. and other WTO members eliminated textile and apparel quotas on January 1, 2005, leading to a shift in global production towards larger, more industrialized countries like China and India.
• Impact on Developing Countries: The elimination of quotas threatens the livelihoods of millions in smaller, less industrialized countries, potentially causing unemployment, poverty, and economic instability.
• Unintended Benefits of Quotas: While quotas were initially intended to protect developed countries, they inadvertently helped smaller developing countries develop their apparel sectors, creating jobs and promoting industrialization.
• Need for Policy Intervention: Developed countries have a self-interest in supporting at-risk countries through policy intervention, including economic, security, and systemic development considerations.

Key Information

Importance of the Apparel Sector

• Employment Generation: The apparel sector provides relatively well-paid jobs, especially in rural areas, and is a critical source of income for many small developing countries.
• Industrialization Catalyst: It helps countries transition from agriculture to industry by building skills, infrastructure, and attracting investment.
• Foreign Exchange and Tax Revenue: Apparel exports contribute significantly to foreign exchange earnings and government tax revenue, which are essential for development and public services.
• Gender Empowerment: The sector is female-dominated, offering women employment and independence in societies where such opportunities are otherwise limited.

Impact of Quota Elimination

• At-Risk Countries: Countries that are highly dependent on apparel exports (comprising 50% or more of total goods exports or manufacturing employment) are most vulnerable.
• Examples of At-Risk Countries: Bangladesh, Cambodia, Haiti, Lesotho, Madagascar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and others.
• Economic Consequences: Loss of the apparel sector could lead to GDP contraction, employment decline, and increased poverty, particularly in LDCs.

Policy Responses

• Current Measures: Developed countries have primarily used trade preferences and safeguard provisions to limit Chinese exports.
• Limitations of Safeguard Provisions: These are temporary and do not address the long-term needs of at-risk countries. They also do not prevent other industrialized countries from taking over market share.
• Recommended Policy Elements:
  1. Enhanced Trade Preferences: Extend duty-free access to apparel exports for at-risk countries.
  2. Technical Assistance: Help these countries improve infrastructure, customs procedures, and competitiveness.
  3. Export Differentiation: Support efforts to help at-risk countries differentiate their products in the global market.
  4. Dislocation Management: Provide assistance to manage economic disruptions and support workers during the transition.

Criticism of Laissez-Faire Approach

• Economic Stability: A decline in the apparel sector threatens both short-term economic stability and long-term growth prospects.
• Security Concerns: Unemployment and poverty may lead to political instability, which could have security implications for developed countries.
• WTO Commitment: The Doha Ministerial Declaration of 2001 reaffirmed the need for preferential access and technical assistance for poor countries, supporting a case for intervention.

Table of At-Risk Countries

Country	GNI per Capita	Apparel Exports as % of Total Goods Exports	Apparel Sector as % of Total Manufacturing Employment	Impact Estimates
Bangladesh	$400	62.3	40	ITC: Uncertain; IMF: GDP contracts by 2.3%, employment declines by 4.5%
Cambodia	$300	75.5	64	IMF: Most vulnerable in Asia; GDP growth could drop by 2%
Cape Verde	$1,490	50.0	Not available	ITC: Region's share of U.S. apparel imports will fall
Dominican Republic	$2,070	51.4	70	ITC: Share may decline, but likely to be a quick-turnaround supplier
El Salvador	$2,200	62.6	57	ITC: Status as U.S. supplier uncertain
Haiti	$380	83	40	ITC: Share likely to decline significantly
Laos PDR	$340	62	Not available	Not available
Lesotho	$590	90	90	ITC: Share likely to decline
Madagascar	$290	50	40	ITC: Share likely to decline
Mauritius	$4,090	49.9	90	ITC: Share likely to decline
Nepal	$240	68	Not available	Not available
Sri Lanka	$930	52.4	33	ITC: Share likely to fall, but expected to be a niche supplier
Honduras	$970	38.3	26	ITC: Future as a U.S. supplier uncertain
Maldives	$2,350	31.9	Not available	Not available

Conclusion

The elimination of textile and apparel quotas has created a significant challenge for smaller, less industrialized developing countries. While developed countries have focused on containing China's influence, this approach is insufficient. A more comprehensive and supportive policy framework is needed to ensure that these countries can adjust to the new trade environment and continue to benefit from global trade.