布鲁盖尔-An-anatomy-of-inclusive-growth-in-Europe_114页_2mb
报告摘要
Summary of An Anatomy of Inclusive Growth in Europe
Core Content
An Anatomy of Inclusive Growth in Europe by Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff explores the concept of inclusive growth in the context of the European Union. It emphasizes the importance of addressing inequality and social mobility to ensure sustainable and fair economic development. The report also examines the role of technological change in shaping income inequality and outlines policy recommendations for both national and EU institutions to foster inclusive growth.
Main Viewpoints
1. Inequality and Social Challenges in the EU
- Poverty: Extremely rare in the EU, with less than 1% of the population living below $2.50 a day.
- Income Inequality: Generally lower than in the US and emerging economies, but varies across countries.
- Unemployment: A significant issue, especially in southern EU countries, with high youth unemployment and material deprivation.
- Intergenerational Divide: Widening between young and old, which affects social mobility and economic prospects.
2. Importance of Inclusive Growth
- Inclusive growth is not just about GDP growth, but also about opportunities in education, health, employment, and the environment.
- It is crucial for social stability and preventing disengagement among citizens.
- The report highlights that inclusive growth is a key target in the EU's Europe 2020 strategy.
- Inequality and poverty negatively affect social mobility, educational achievements, health outcomes, and economic growth.
3. Technological Change and Inequality
- Skill Premium: In the EU, the skill premium has declined in many countries, unlike the US and China.
- Job Polarisation: Technology tends to replace routine tasks, but not non-routine ones. This leads to a decline in demand for middle-skilled jobs.
- Automation Risk: The report finds mixed evidence about the risk of automation in the EU, suggesting that the impact varies significantly.
- EU vs. US: Unlike the US, where high inequality is associated with a higher share of top earners in finance and law, Europe has a more balanced distribution of income among high earners, with a significant portion in manufacturing.
Key Findings
- EU Inequality Trends: Income inequality in the EU has declined since 1994, especially after taxes and transfers.
- Brexit and Inequality: Inequality and poverty were significant factors in the Brexit vote, alongside demographic and geographic differences.
- Education and Health: Poorer children tend to underperform in school and have worse health outcomes, limiting their future opportunities.
- Social Mobility: Weak in southern Europe and the UK, especially for children from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Policy Recommendations
-
National Policies:
- Improve access to quality education and early childhood programs to enhance social mobility.
- Reform welfare systems to make them more effective in reducing inequality.
- Make tax systems more progressive and reduce the burden on low-income households.
- Ensure that fiscal consolidation does not disproportionately affect young families and education.
-
EU Policies:
- Use regulatory power to set social standards and encourage best practices.
- Focus on areas where the EU has real competence to promote inclusive growth.
- Avoid making promises in areas where the EU lacks instruments to deliver.
- Address unemployment, especially youth unemployment, through both national and EU-level macroeconomic and labor market policies.
Conclusion
The report concludes that while the EU has made progress in reducing income inequality, there is a need for stronger action on unemployment and social mobility. Inclusive growth should be a top political priority, and the EU can support this by leveraging its regulatory power and promoting effective national policies. The future of inclusive growth in Europe depends on equipping the next generation of workers with skills that align with technological advancements, such as social and creative intelligence.
Key Data from Table 1
| Region | No. of Countries | Poverty (%) | Income Inequality (Gini) | Unemployment Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU15 (ex. south & UK) | 10 | 0.5 | 27 | 7.8 |
| Southern EU | 4 | 2.3 | 34 | 19.4 |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 0.5 | 35 | 6.2 |
| Baltics | 3 | 1.5 | 34 | 9.6 |
| Other newer EU members | 10 | 1.7 | 30 | 10.3 |
| United States | 1 | 1.3 | 37 | 6.1 |
| Non-EU advanced (ex. US) | 7 | 0.3 | 29 | 4.8 |
| China | 1 | 19.3 | 53 | 4.1 |
| Asia (ex. China & CIS) | 19 | 23.6 | 40 | 4.5 |
| Latin America | 19 | 12.1 | 44 | 6.9 |
| Africa | 36 | 72.5 | 44 | 12.0 |
| CIS (former USSR) | 10 | 19.3 | 35 | 6.9 |
Note: The data is based on the latest available statistics (typically 2012–2015).
Conclusion
Inclusive growth is essential for long-term economic and social stability in Europe. While the EU has made progress in reducing inequality, it still faces significant challenges in unemployment and social mobility. Technological change has not led to a substantial increase in inequality in Europe, suggesting that other factors such as education and welfare policies are more influential. The report calls for a reorientation of policy to focus on the needs of the most vulnerable and to ensure that growth is both robust and fair.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载